Re: [Fis] Music : Noise = Meaning : Data

2018-03-22 Thread Bruno Marchal
Dear Stan, > On 20 Mar 2018, at 20:22, Stanley N Salthe wrote: > > Bruno -- In this context I like to point out the constraints on our abilities > of perception. First, we are physical. That is a strong metaphysical assumption. See my paper for showing this is not

Re: [Fis] Welcome to Knowledge Market and the FIS Sci-coins

2018-03-22 Thread Michel Petitjean
Dear Arturo, Sorry for my naive question, but isn't the named set theory something different from the set theory? Best, Michel. 2018-03-22 7:48 GMT+01:00 : > Dear Mark, > the named set theory does not solve the Russell paradox. > Therefore it would be better to use, in

[Fis] Theory of named sets (TNS) and General Information Theory (GIT)

2018-03-22 Thread Krassimir Markov
Dear Mark and Colleagues, Thank you for the nice remarks! The concept “INFOS” had been proposed in the end of 1989. The second part of the General Information Theory (GIT) is just the “Theory of INFOS”. The are many interesting ideas about INFOS, some of them you have pointed. Step by step I

Re: [Fis] Welcome to Knowledge Market and the FIS Sci-coins

2018-03-22 Thread tozziarturo
Dear Mark, the named set theory does not solve the Russell paradox. Therefore it would be better to use, in such approaches, the best theory available, i.e., the Fraenkel-Zermelo sets. In turn, the latter displays some limits: for example, the need of a set with infinite elements.