I hope the following passage I’ve written on Nagarjuna will be of use for this
discussion on the nature of self. The passage is from a manuscript I’ve just
completed on silence and postmodernism.
Nagarjuna’s thinking is deeply conversant with silence and with the use of
paradox as well. For
the one proposed in the material that was
> distributed.
>
> I feel that the role and significance of instabilities in the physical world,
> particularly life processes, has not been adequately expounded and that we
> may only be beginning to understand them.
>
> I hope this help
in an instant, and
>
> Like an Indivisible Centre Stand
>
> At once Surrounding all Eternity.
>
> Twas not a sphere
>
> Yet did appear
>
> One infinite. Twas somewhat everywhere,
>
> And though it had a Power to see
>
Kauffman
> > <kauff...@uic.edu <mailto:kauff...@uic.edu>>:
> >
> >> Dear Steve,
> >> You write
> >> "But in later years he eventually recognized that the possibility of
> >> relating propositions in language to facts concerning th
I would like to contribute to the current ongoing discussion regarding the
relation between information and meaning. I agree with Dai Griffiths and others
that the term information is a problematic construction. Since it is often used
as an example of fitting the details of a specific worldly
While I sometimes feel as if I speak a different language than many of you, I
believe that my initial notes for a book on creativity may shed some light on
the ongoing current discussion. Simply put, information is what a machine has
the capacity to produce. However, a machine cannot produce