Dear Sungchul, I do not have anything against you, therefore sorry for my
words, but your propositions gave me the opportunity to demonstrate the
weirdness of such approaches for science.
YOU find it convenient to define communication as an irreducibly triadic
process (physical, chemical,
o
me very appropriate for this particular venue.Respectfully,Jesse David
DinneenSchool of Information Management, Victoria University of Wellington
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:11 AM, tozziart...@libero.it <tozziart...@libero.it>
wrote:
Dear FISers,
science talks about observables, i.e., quantif
Dear FISers,
science talks about observables, i.e., quantifiable parameters.
Therefore, describing the word "information" in terms of philosophers'
statements, hypothetical useless triads coming from nowhere, the ridicolous
Rupert Sheldrake's account, mind communication, qualitative subjective
Dear FISers,
it is clear (and it has been demonstrated) that what you cal l"agent" is
something that... increases the dimensions of the discourse.
For example, our brain, rather than "extract" information from the environment,
makes exactly the opposite process, by "diluting" and "increasing"
and eukaryotic
signaling systems. Among other evolutionary aspects, cellular strategies for
the construction of novel functional codes via the intermixing of informational
architectures could be related to the persistence of retro-elements with
obvious viral ancestry.
--
Dear FISers,
This text is brief is an effort to provide a viable solution for a double
concern:
a) 1) the proliferation of models, theories and
interpretations that suggest pseudoscientific explanations (e.g., lacking the
even theoretical possibility of empiric testability) for not-observable
Dear FISers, I'm sorry for bothering you, but I start not to agree from the
very first principles.
The only language able to describe and quantify scientific issues is
mathematics.Without math, you do not have observables, and information is
observable. Therefore, information IS energy or
Dear Fisers, a big doubt...
We know that the information of a 3D black hole is proportional to its 2D
horizon, according to the Bekenstein-Hawking equations.
However, an hypotetical observer traveling at light speed (who watches a black
hole at rest) detects a very large black hole horizon, due
Dear Fisers, a novel, provocative issue...
An observed two-dimensional shadow might encompass more information than its
corresponding three-dimensional object. By changing the orientation of a
three-dimensional object or the observer’s position, we detect different
shadows from diverse
I like your respectful use of capital letters.
My mind boggles.
Best rgds
David
On 24 Feb 2017, at 15:24, tozziart...@libero.it
wrote:
Dear FISers,
hi!
A possible novel d
Professor Physics, University North Texas
Pediatrician ASL Na2Nord, Italy
Comput Intell Lab, University Manitoba
http://arturotozzi.webnode.it/
>Messaggio originale
>Da: "Robert E. Ulanowicz" <u...@umces.edu>
>Data: 24/02/2017 18.48
>A: "tozziart...@libero.it&
Dear FISers, hi! A possible novel discussion (if you like it, of course!):
A SYMMETRY-BASED ACCOUNT OF LIFE AND EVOLUTION
After the Big Bang, a gradual increase in
thermodynamic entropy is occurring in our Universe (Ellwanger, 2012). Because
of the relationships between entropy
and symmetries
Dear FISers:
Recently introduced versions of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem (BUT) state that
a feature on a n-manifold projects to two features with matching description
onto a n+1 manifold (Peters, 2016; Peters and Tozzi, 2016a, 2016b; Tozzi, 2016;
Tozzi and Peters, 2016a, 2016b).
Starting from this
Dear Krassimir,
After the hot discussion about the elusive meaning of the term "information",
we are allowed to use the first order predicate logic:
a) The definition of information is not univocal. b) The definition of life is
information.c) Therefore, the definition of life is not univocal.
Dear FISers,
In touch with Ludwig Wittgenstein's favourite example, let's play a chess game.
Imagine that the chessboard is the
information.
We have the whites, e.g., Jaynes, Logan, Kauffmann, Marijuan (more or less!),
Loet, Chu-Hsi (Zhu Xi), Susskind's account of loss of information in
sity North TexasPediatrician ASL
Na2Nord, ItalyComput Intell Lab, University
Manitobahttp://arturotozzi.webnode.it/
Messaggio originale
Da: "Joseph Brenner" <joe.bren...@bluewin.ch>
Data: 07/12/2016 15.15
A: "fis"<fis@listas.unizar.es>
Cc: <tozziart...@libero.i
Dear Karl,
Your noteworthy account is a typical example of a well-built scientific
theory: by putting together different bricks from several influential sources
(Piaget, Gibson, dynamic systems theory), you create a solid, concrete building
that sounds very logic, and also in touch with common
05/12/2016 0.50
A: "fis"<fis@listas.unizar.es>
Cc: <tozziart...@libero.it>
Ogg: Re: [Fis] Who may proof that consciousness is an Euclidean n-space ???
FISers:This is just a short note to communicate about two matters of
substantial importance with respect to foundational iss
Dear Karl,
Thanks for your wise
comments.
You wrote: "The session so far has raised the
points: meta-communication, subject-matter, order, spaces.
a.) Meta-communication
Gordana’s summary explicates the need to have a system of references
that FIS can use to discuss whatever it wishes to
TexasPediatrician ASL
Na2Nord, ItalyComput Intell Lab, University
Manitobahttp://arturotozzi.webnode.it/
Messaggio originale
Da: "Krassimir Markov" <mar...@foibg.com>
Data: 27/11/2016 23.58
A: <tozziart...@libero.it>, "FIS"<fis@listas.unizar.es&
;Joseph Brenner" <joe.bren...@bluewin.ch>
Data: 26/11/2016 21.05
A: <tozziart...@libero.it>, "fis"<fis@listas.unizar.es>
Ogg: Re: [Fis] Who may prove that consciousness is an Euclidean n-space ???
Dear FISers,
At the risk of attracting the anger of all the
mathe
Dear Joseph, Hi!I will go through your papers and your logical apprach in the
very next days.
In the meantime, you can find the full texts of the published manuscripts by
Peters/Tozzi here:
22 matches
Mail list logo
