that shift was I'd welcome a brief
description. Also if you have any insights into why you had that shift, for
example, what someone said.
Thanks,
Jeremy Sherman
Author, Neither Ghost Nor Machine: The emergence and nature of selves.
___
Fis mailing list
Fis
he's actually proposing.
Best,
Jeremy Sherman
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
Deacon addressed this all very clearly in his January paper. I'm guessing
for most FIS members his argument changed little or nothing.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
wrote:
Loet -- Well, so you favor the definition of information as an invention
of
Amen.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Marcus Abundis 55m...@gmail.com wrote:
From Loet's post:
During the recent conference in Vienna, I was amazed how many of our
colleagues wish to ground information in physics.
I would say that I was disappointed . . .
For me this exchange on It from
implies as
modest any careful scientific work.
Jeremy Sherman
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Moisés André Nisenbaum
moises.nisenb...@ifrj.edu.br wrote:
Hi, Pedro.
I didnt receive th image (Figure 1. The Four Great Domains of Science)
Would you please send it again?
Thank you.
Moises
Hi Pedro,
Jeremy Sherman here, a long-time pirate. Pleased to meet you. You say:
I am also critical with the autogenesis model systems--wouldn't it be far
clearer approaching a (relatively) simple prokaryotic cell and discuss upon
its intertwining of the communication and self-production
