The utility of logarithms? I've always thought using a slide rule was more
esthetic than pushing buttons on a calculator. Perhaps few people still know
what a slide rule can do. Of course, the result might be a little less
accurate . . .
Best,
Joseph
-Original Message-
From: Fis
Stan,
Good, but things can also run in the opposite direction. How about variety
(plus more energy) generating more variety, more possibilities and allowing
new information to emerge? Standard logical analysis is inadequate because
it cannot handle this picture.
Joseph
_
From:
Dear All,
Information is physical and non-physical, simultaneously and sequentially.
Best regards,
Joseph
_
From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of
tozziart...@libero.it
Sent: jeudi, 31 mai 2018 08:34
To: fis@listas.unizar.es; Emanuel Diamant
Subject: Re:
Perhaps you will also be interested in my brief comments on
information-as-process in my 2011 paper in Information 2(3), 560-578. It
seems a bit too simple to say that a computer, machine, whatever can process
all reflections if these include high-level complex exchanges of energy in
and between
Dear All again,
Terry has introduced an absolutely essential concept on which we need to
focus, that of a generative logic of informational relationships. I would
just like to point out that we are not starting from zero. Some of us, for
example Mark J. and I have already recognized the need
Dear All,
The problem that I see with the approach of Sungchul and others like it is
its reference to data, specifically, quantitative data or their semiotic
equivalent. Without a robust theory of information-as-process, there is no
way of capturing the qualitative aspects of information and
further point is to then ask whether a logic of evolutionary biology
is a logic of recursive transductions over history. The critical point
is what Joseph Brenner argued before Christmas in objecting to Peirce:
we struggle to express the specific
?
_
From: Søren Brier [mailto:sbr@cbs.dk]
Sent: samedi, 16 décembre 2017 13:28
To: Joseph Brenner; fis
Subject: RE: [Fis] Comes the Revolution
Dear Joseph
This very Peircean of you as The challenge is to reconcile our roles as
informational organisms and agents within nature and as stewards
Dear Pedro, Dear FISers,
I regret that I have difficulty in relating to the current FIS discussion,
but that is my problem. I see little progress since the appearance of
Lupasco's physical - biological - contradictorial information; Kauffman,
Logan's biotic and Ulanowicz' apophatic information;
Dear All,
Terry's phrase deserves at least the attention, if not the agreement of all of
us. In my view, qualitative terms belong in science if they follow some sort of
logic. There are risks, of fraud and pseudo-science, but these risks cannot be
avoided in reality by relying on mathematics
Message -
From: Jose Javier Blanco Rivero
To: Joseph Brenner
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Fw: Idealism and Materialism - and Empiricism
Dear Joseph,
Luhmann's concept of meaning (Sinn) is defined exactly as the unity of the
difference between actuality and
Dear Colleagues,
This is simply to register a dissenting opinion, for similar reasons, with the
last two notes, if nothing else to say that there can be one:
1. Regarding John C.'s view of the value of Pierce, there can be no common
ground. Scholastic, propositional logic is part of the
Dear Arturo,
I think this formulation is correct and very useful. It implies, in the formal
sense of real implication, a dynamics of emergence of the more complex states.
Gerhard Luhn has also pointed to this emergence (he calls it of 'new laws') as
a property of the universe, of which are our
Dear Gordana, Dear All,
In a few carefully chosen words, Gordana has established a 'two faces' picture
of 'agency', involving energy where it should be and with reference to several
levels (the limit cases). All this is within the principles of physics, closure
and completeness, with no
Dear Gordana and Friends,
In 2002, the cybernetician Stephen Wolfram published a massive book with the
title, A New Kind of Science. For me, it was not: it was an attempt to explain
the simplest, quasi-non-living structures of living systems by recourse to
simple algorithms and a multitude of
Dear Pedro and All,
Thanks to Pedro again for this thought-provoking theme. We are all in states of
greater or lesser ignorance regarding it!
Here is just, again, a thought about your quote of Conrad: "when we look at a
biological system we are looking at the face of the underlying physics of
Dear All,
I am sorry but I am still not satisfied with the evolution of this discussion
to date. I am still looking forward to some explicit comment on my initial
question of why mini black holes would not evaporate. I note that both Alex and
Bruno asked the same question, before we have seen
Dear FISers,
There is 'something' in Terry's approach that I would like to refer to as
wisdom. Wisdom need not be thought of as esoteric, but to describe at least one
further level of recursive information processing in which, echoing Terry,
absent properties are as essential as present ones.
orsuk-Ulam theorem, A and non-A become
T in a dimension lower…
Arturo Tozzi
AA Professor Physics, University North Texas
Pediatrician ASL Na2Nord, Italy
Comput Intell Lab, University Manitoba
http://arturotozzi.webnode.it/
Messaggio originale----
Da: "Joseph Bre
Dear Folks,
Arturo wrote:
"therefore logic, in general, cannot be anymore useful in the description of
our world. I'm sad about that, but that's all."
The answer is to change logic from one of propositions (Lesniewski-Tarski) or
mathematics (Zermelo-Fraenkel) to one of the states of real
'. That principle should apply generally.
Thank you.
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Karl Javorszky
To: Joseph Brenner
Cc: Terrence Deacon ; fis ; John Collier ; Gyorgy Darvas ; Bob Logan ; Andrei
Khrennikov ; raf...@capurro.de
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 10:22 AM
Subject
- Original Message -
From: Karl Javorszky
To: Joseph Brenner
Cc: Terrence Deacon ; fis ; John Collier ; Gyorgy Darvas ; Bob Logan ; Andrei
Khrennikov ; raf...@capurro.de
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Is quantum information the basis of spacetime?
Well
Dear All,
I agree with the consensus I see emerging. Andrei shows the problem of trying
to pin down a complex process with a single term - information. And I agree
with Rafael that information must have a valence. On the other hand, as such,
information cannot be completely defined
Dear Francesco and All,
The implications of your note go far beyond scientific communication as such,
but we can start here.
1. Francesco, you are entirely right to 'open up' the otherwise inert standard
concepts of probability to include a qualitative (subjective-objective)
component. You
publishing, maybe we should get rid of the
neo-capitalist market system for this as well as other reasons! I also have
some comments on Bhaskar but I would like to read the article again. Many
thanks.
Best regards,
Joseph Brenner
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Johnson"
Dear Pedro,
Most of us would agree that standard Western science does not give a complete
answer to questions about life and mind. As we try to seek better foundations
in general and for information science in particular, we may be able to benefit
from knowledge resources which have not
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
The last couple of postings have opened the discussion in a direction their
authors may not have intended. Bob's felt personal plea for a
phenomenological approach to biology, and hence to other sciences, and as
the foundation of a philosophy, begs the question of
for reality and one for
mathematical reality. The key would seem to me to make sure they are used in
their proper respective informational domains.
Best,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: Joseph Brenner
Cc: fis
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 11:45
Dear John,
Sorry you have been ill.
I agree fully with your statement: All of these explanations, and even stating
the problem, require information notions, not just energy as in classical
physics.
What I object to are statements or implications that information, whether in
boundaries or
Dear FISers,
The most scientific aspect of the recent exchanges is their existence. It is
obvious that some people feel more comfortable than others in ascribing
properties to quantum particles that are characteristic of the thermodynamic
world in which we exist, in particular difference (let
Dear Folks,
I do not wish to be negative, but I think this example is contaminated by a
homunculus. There are so much energy coming into the system from various
sources that the alleged result is not surprising. I would be glad to be wrong
but the decision should be up to someone like Terry
'fis'" <fis@listas.unizar.es
Cc: "Joseph Brenner" <joe.bren...@bluewin.ch>
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Sustainability through multilevel research: Energetic
Realm-Informational Realm. Social Complexity
Dear Joseph and colleagues,
Tha
Dear Pedro,
I agree with your presentation here of the dynamics of informational entities
and the necessary dominance of the informational realm. But my reaction to your
placing the energetic and informational realm in a kind of opposition was a
Capurrian 'hm'. What is still and will be always
Dear John and All,
I have read this paper, but it seems to me that the word 'idealization' has a
key place in it. Thus, the statement that 'quantum mechanics is about the
structure of information' begs the question of what information is being
discussed. Is it not conceivable, in the
Dear Pedro and Colleagues,
Pedro's note has brought out more clearly to me the concept of an
'Itinerary' as a path between Momenta. I for one would be willing to accept
the discipline that comments should address relations and movement between
Momenta in an AGREED UPON SEQUENCE. The one in
Dear Mark,
I find much novelty in your interesting approach as I read your note of
October 1 and this one. This novelty should not be lost by imposing standard
patterns of interpretation on it. If we really believe "it's time we confess
in science just how little we know about language, that
Dear Mark,
Thank you for this note, which points correctly to the fact that there was
something missing in the debate. Intersubjectivity is a good word for it, but
phenomenology in general is probably no longer the answer, if it ever was.
Check out the new book by Tom Sparrow, The End of
Dear All,
This note from Fernando clearly spells out his universe of discourse (practical
problems; everyday life). However, in stating that
our acts are neither actions nor events... Our acts are
phenomenological;
but that current information theory is only mathematical, dealing with
in their dimensionality, with meaning associated with the emergent
component with the higher dimensionality.
Curious,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Robert E. Ulanowicz u...@umces.edu
To: John Collier colli...@ukzn.ac.za
Cc: l...@leydesdorff.net; 'Joseph Brenner' joe.bren
Dear Fernando,
This is becoming very interesting. I understand your critique, but I do not
believe it applies exactly to what I am trying to say. I start from a position
that the apodictic statement by Wiener is not or in any case is no longer
valid. In my view, the following should be taken
critique of ‘it-from-bit’
and my ‘proposal’ for going beyond it.
Thank you and best regards,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: John Collier
To: Joseph Brenner
Cc: fis
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 12:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Fis] Philosophy, Computing, and Information
Dear Colleagues and Reasoned Opponents,
A scientific position may be the object of rational disagreement and
discussion, but the 'ganging up' of some individuals on a highly respected
colleague is disgraceful and unacceptable. By this note I am suggesting to
Pedro that Ericsson-Zenith, Sherman
of information,
adding something to the 'how' side, but there is a lot more to be done here.
Best wishes,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Loet Leydesdorff
To: 'Joseph Brenner' ; 'fis'
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . . Loss of Information
Dear Colleagues,
I completely agree with Krassimir's position and on the importance of the issue
on which it taken. Neither he nor I wish to say that there cannot be models and
insights for science in religious beliefs, such as the Kabbala, but then John's
diagram would be more appropriate if
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Brenner
To: fis
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 10:13 AM
Subject: Fw: [Fis] Philosophy, Computing, and Information - apologies!
Dear Colleagues,
I completely agree with Krassimir's position and on the importance of the issue
on which it taken
Dear Srinandan, Dear John and All,
At the Vienna Information Summit, I will present a paper in the Symmetry
Section of Gyuri Darvas entitled Symmetry and Information; Brothers in Arms.
I wished by this title to convey the idea that symmetry and information somehow
emerged together from a prior
Dear FISers,
I have no difficulty in understanding Loet's approach as measuring one form of
interdisciplinarity. However, it requires well-defined quantitative entities -
classes, categories and journal articles to which they apply. I thus do not
think that it exhausts the possibilities of the
...@leydesdorff.net
Cc: Joseph Brenner; fis
Subject: Re: [Fis] Information-as-Process
The problem with this approach (and approaches like it) is that it is
descriptive and not explanatory. The distribution of the shape, in my model,
can be described, perhaps, but the process or action decision
Dear Carolina, Bob L., Bob U., Sören and Krassimir,
First of all thanks to Carolina for having launched a most interesting
thread, of which I have changed the title since the issues are broader than
that of Neuroinformation alone, as Francesco has noted.
My first point is a response to
Dear Pedro, Dear Sören,
Please let me call the attention of both of you to Sören's article in
Biosemiotics of 24 May 2012 What Does it Take to Produce Interpretation?
Informational, Peircean and Code-Semiotic Views on Biosemiotics. Judging
from the abstract, this article criticizes at least
Karl,
I welcome the intent of your Workshop to deal with real contradictions but I
have some doubts that combinatorics by itself suffices. Earlier, you wrote:
Therefore, no methodology has evolved of appeasing, soothing,
compromise-building among equally valid logical statements that
Dear John,
Thank you for your note of October 27 which helped to bring several things
into focus for me. First, Pedro's The Travellers can be seen as a
questioning of all but some part of any single current approach to
information and meaning.
Suppose I assume that all existence, including
the beginning, as information?
Please do send me an E-mail copy of the latest version of your book. The one I
have is dated December 9, 2011.
Best,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Bob Logan
To: PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ ; fis ; Joseph Brenner
Sent: Monday
John,
Please, if you would, explain the relationship of the theory in this paper
to a conception of information. If the 'demon' quote has access to a source
of energy unquote, then of course one can draw almost any conclusion one
wants. We know from Mark Burgin's note, about which I also
some function, as in the paper referred to in
John's note, is a formal exercise.
Thank you and best wishes,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Burgin, Mark
To: Joseph Brenner
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Krassimir's Information Quadruple and GIT. Quintuples
will not repeat here.
Comments welcome,
Joseph
*Reviewed in SCIENCE, 345:6193, p. 147, 11 July 2014
- Original Message -
From: Burgin, Mark
To: Joseph Brenner
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Krassimir's Information Quadruple and GIT
Dear Krassimir and Colleagues,
I have followed this discussion with interest but not total agreement. As I
have commented to Krassimir previously, I feel that his system, based on
symbols as outlined in his paper, is too static to capture the dynamics of
complex information processes and their
Dear Shu-Kun, Dear Pedro,
Please count me in for any assistance I can give - I live only a short
train ride away from Basel. As for participation, it would be very
helpful to know already the windows in September you are considering.
My personal preference would be as early in September as
discussed the bandwidth of continuous process channels. It is worth looking
at.
John
At 10:28 PM 2014-07-14, Srinandan Dasmahapatra wrote:
I think I agree with Joseph Brenner here. Analogue computing is linked to
real processes, while living beings find ways of transducing information
out
Dear Colleagues,
My first reaction to this suggested project is that the logic and philosophy
of information (where I am more comfortable) would have little to
contribute. However, analogue computation is an area in which insights from
some complex theories of information might be useful.
of
information encouraged me to send the above message (without wishing to take
any undue credit for myself).
Best,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Francesco Rizzo
To: Joseph Brenner
Cc: Pedro C. Marijuan ; fis@listas.unizar.es
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 12:37 PM
Subject: Re
Dear Francesco,
Thank you for a most interesting overview of your work. What I would be most
interested in would be a summary of the real processes underlying
trans-in-form-action and its relation to information - and
trans-information. The use of the prefix 'trans-' in transdisciplinarity is
, but I much prefer yours.
I look forward very much to your comments on the above.
Best,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Loet Leydesdorff l...@leydesdorff.net
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Cc: 'Joseph Brenner' joe.bren...@bluewin.ch
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:53 AM
Subject
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
Congratulations to Pedro and Krassimir on your design for a great meeting!
I just take this occasion to mention again an idea of mine, which I think is
important, of encouraging speakers to write critically, even primarily, about
the work of other active members
Dear Lars-Göran, Andrei and Hans,
As you (I hope) have seen, I am trying to see how the evolution of macroscopic
processes can be described in terms of changing probabilities, and I am
encouraged to believe this is possible. If you allow the extension from QM, all
of the following would seem
Dear Hans and Dino,
This is a direct question to both of you, to which I have not found a clear
answer: are value and amplitude the only parameters that have been assigned to
probability?
In my theory, the changing value of actuality and potentiality of specific
antagonistic process elements
Dear All,
I think I have discovered what it was that was bothering me about QBism: it was
only the particular 'detour' through atomic physics that Hans made, that is,
one that requires Bayesian probability to describe its terms (see New Year
Lecture). Here are two key tenets of QBism,
Dear Hans and All,
This is a very useful form of responses, which enables further directed
comments. I start with Lars', which is perhaps as Hans says crucial:
Lars -- How does QBism differ from Copenhagen? This is a crucial question. It
differs not at all in the formalism, and only subtly
, is meaningless! Is this an achievement? -- to render
meaningless the activities within the socially-constructed machinery guided by
the socially-constructed theories?
In conversation with Joseph Brenner and others I have used the rainbow as a
metaphor. The rainbow is a phenomenon that everyone
Dear John,
The Koch article is worth reading as a kind of statement within the current
reductionist paradigm I believe it is necessary to get beyond. It is all the
more insidious because of Koch's research credentials, but it contains all the
'push-button' words that I have seen in his
?abstract_id=2355880 .
From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 9:53 PM
To: Joseph Brenner; Roly Belfer
Cc: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] social flow
Dear FIS colleagues
Dear Roly, Dear Pedro,
Thank you for taking this thread in a for me very interesting direction. As you
know, interesting means what I find my logical system can confirm, improve,
validate, etc. The two notes share one feature that one might criticize,
namely, that they deal essentially with
Dear Jerry,
Thank you as usual for your thought-provoking note, which nevertheless requires
the following clarification of your position. You ask, because I assume that
your answers to your four questions is no, that there is no tension in the
group between the empirical and abstract, given
Dear Raquel, Dear Colleagues,
I have been following the development of this topic with an interest that is
not unmixed with concern. In particular, since we are supposed to deal with
'foundations', with some of the assumptions made by Rainer in his note.
First, the reference to levels is
Dear Folks,
Julian Barbour wrote a paper entitled Bit from It for the 2011 FQXi Essay
Contest, readily accessible on-line at Bit from It - FQXi. It won only 4th
prize, but it shows pretty clearly that the It-from-Bit position mistakes
abstraction for reality. As Barbour puts it, just because
Dear John, Dear Sören and All,
I think John is basically correct in starting from a physical basis for the
origin of information in the universe, but Sören is also correct in that
something more is needed to get to meaning. My view is, however, that the
latter's cybersemiotics is based on a
reference to Maimonides in de Waal's book and will be sure
to buy it, but those of you who are familiar with Maimonides will be aware of
his limitations . . .
Best regards,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Søren Brier
To: 'Joseph Brenner' ; John Collier ; Pedro Clemente
Dear Pedro,
I and I am sure most of us are grateful when you open up the debate in this
way. To go farther, though, people must be ready to ask many questions about
familiar concepts such as the following:
1. Are there serious alternatives to Aristotelian causality?
2. Is it possible to
Leydesdorff
To: Joseph Brenner ; fis@listas.unizar.es
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Absence and life
Dear Joe,
Yes, these two notions of interaction information were specified in debate
between Klaus Krippendorff and me. See:
Krippendorff, K. (2009). Information
Dear Colleagues,
I am very glad this discussion has started, as (as perhaps no-one but I
remembers) I pointed to the potential importance of Deacon's work a year
ago, after reading his article What is Missing from Theories of
Information?
My position is that what is good in this work can be
-
From: Gyorgy Darvas
To: Pedro C. Marijuan ; fis@listas.unizar.es ; whhbs...@sina.com
Cc: mjs ; Joseph Brenner ; fislist
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] [Fwd: THEORY AND SCIENCE] From QTQ
I disagree!
Theory is a part, an important element of science.
Practice
Dear Pedro, Dear FIS Colleagues,
My thanks and I am sure that of all of us to Pedro for his clear statement of
FIS principles in relation to an informational science (IS) syllabus.
I would just like to suggest that reference to inter- and transdisciplinarity,
in some way, might help to avoid
Dear Gordana and Loet,
Ref.: Cat, Jordi. 2007. The Unity of Science. Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy.
I think you are being too defensive vis à vis the conventional idea of
science. The authority of people who have decided to what information science
must be limited may be open to
Dear Marcin, Gordana, Loet, Krassimir and Colleagues,
I did not think I was going to participate in this discussion, being as I am so
far outside the place when curricula are established and syllabi needed.
Yet when I saw your message, Loet, I was concerned that something very
important in
the existence and validity of both,
as well as the possibility in principle of some areas of overlap, without
conflation.
Best,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Gavin Ritz
To: 'Joseph Brenner'
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: [Fis
Dear Loet, Dear All,
Thank you, Loet, for this very clear expression of the state-of-the-art with
respect to a dynamic design or measure for meaningful information as associated
with negentropy. Today, I would view this position as the analytical skeleton
of the real three-level dynamics of
Dear Michel, Jerry and Loet,
Welcome back to the fray, Jerry, but I recall a kind of gentlemen's
agreement we made at our meeting in Liège, namely, that I can find a place
for your theory, but you should reciprocally find a place for mine! In the
following, I will try to disentangle two major
and translate meaningfully between them. However this
means, as a minimum, accepting the existence and validity of both, as well as
the possibility in principle of some areas of overlap, without conflation.
Best,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Gavin Ritz
To: 'Joseph Brenner'
Sent
. It dovetails with Rosen's and Conrad's works...
best wishes
---Pedro
Joseph Brenner escribió:
Dear Colleagues,
Taken together, the postings of Jamie and Pedro indicate a healthy
dissatisfaction with generally available conceptions of information and point
to the need for new ones
Dear Krassimir,
Thank you for bringing this document to our attention, for completeness. I
would have wished, however, that you had made some comment on it, putting it
into relation with your own work and, for example, that of Mark Burgin,
which are dismissed out of hand.
From my point of
Dear Colleagues,
I can understand Leslie's feeling that a discipline should not be reified -
this is the pathetic fallacy. But I completely agree with Pedro that science is
embedded in society and its role and function must be compatible with the
common good.
I note, in this connection, the
Dear Krassimir, Dear Pedro,
Many thanks again to you and your colleagues for all their hard work in making
the Varna Conference a success. I would just like to mention one aspect that
occurred to me of what might be called a New Information-Scientific Method, as
something that emerged from
Dear Koichiro,
I return to your pertinent summary of May 10 that led me to an unexpected
conclusion, half of which you may like and half you may not like. I apologize
in advance for the latter.
I feel that in point 3. of your note you describe a key to time but you do not
use it!
1.
, and their
opposnents actually do with and to information.
Best wishes,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Robert Ulanowicz u...@umces.edu
To: Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
Cc: Karl Javorszky karl.javors...@gmail.com; Joseph Brenner
joe.bren...@bluewin.ch; u...@cbl.umces.edu
Sent
Dear All,
I return to the original definition of this project because I am not satisfied
with its evolution. There are points in Professor Zhong's perspective on
(natural) intelligence that I still would like to call attention to, apart from
the connection between intelligence and
?
Shall we see where this track might lead?
Best wishes,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Loet Leydesdorff
To: 'Joseph Brenner' ; 'fis'
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 10:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Fis] Fw: INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION: A Charicature
Dear Joseph
Dear Pedro,
I beg your indulgence (3rd note) to make one point: Pedro wrote: I
understand Joseph lamentations, but do not share them, as logical
clarification of an intrinsically evolutionary phenomenon --without any
major discontinuity-- as intelligence is (at least in my view), becomes too
Dear Colleagues,
I have just gone back over the discussion of Intelligence and Information to
try to extract the major new thoughts and my conclusion is one of frustration.
The introduction of the other thread of the fis digest confused me further,
since I could not follow its intention or
Dear Gordana, Stan and All,
Gordana wrote:
From an info-computational approach we may hope to provide a base for the
construction of generative explanatory models for the development of
intelligence by information processing in living organisms.
Stan wrote:
Intelligence, I think, lies more in
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
Distinguished careers in understanding intelligence confront me, a
latecomer, in this new project. So the following are just a few comments on
the logical-philosophical questions that I see on reading Yi-Xin Zhong's
document. First of all, I will be talking only
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
