While I sometimes feel as if I speak a different language than many of you, I
believe that my initial notes for a book on creativity may shed some light on
the ongoing current discussion. Simply put, information is what a machine has
the capacity to produce. However, a machine cannot produce
Kauffman
> > <kauff...@uic.edu <mailto:kauff...@uic.edu>>:
> >
> >> Dear Steve,
> >> You write
> >> "But in later years he eventually recognized that the possibility of
> >> relating propositions in language to facts concerning th
I would like to contribute to the current ongoing discussion regarding the
relation between information and meaning. I agree with Dai Griffiths and others
that the term information is a problematic construction. Since it is often used
as an example of fitting the details of a specific worldly
in an instant, and
>
> Like an Indivisible Centre Stand
>
> At once Surrounding all Eternity.
>
> Twas not a sphere
>
> Yet did appear
>
> One infinite. Twas somewhat everywhere,
>
> And though it had a Power to see
>
the one proposed in the material that was
> distributed.
>
> I feel that the role and significance of instabilities in the physical world,
> particularly life processes, has not been adequately expounded and that we
> may only be beginning to understand them.
>
> I hope this help
I hope the following passage I’ve written on Nagarjuna will be of use for this
discussion on the nature of self. The passage is from a manuscript I’ve just
completed on silence and postmodernism.
Nagarjuna’s thinking is deeply conversant with silence and with the use of
paradox as well. For
