Dear Arthuro,
> On 17 May 2018, at 16:30, tozziart...@libero.it wrote:
>
> Dear Bruno,
>
> as far as you wrote and I understood, your Mechanistic framework requires the
> tenet that quantum wave collapse does not exist.
>
> In order to prove that, you invoke the authority of Everett.
>
>
I completely agree, Arturo! And Everett’s many world’s interpretation have been
criticised, I would say, killed, since long, for example by Healy and Stein,
both in NOUS XVIII, 1984. The problem is conceptual; what does Everett mean by
a world? Referring to your simple example below, one might r
Dear Bruno,
as far as you wrote and I understood, your Mechanistic framework requires the
tenet that quantum wave collapse does not exist.
In order to prove that, you invoke the authority of Everett.
I want to provide a simple, very rough explanation (excuse me!), for the FISers
unaware of
