Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism

2015-08-03 Thread pedro marijuan
Cc: fisfis@listas.unizar.es Subject: Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism Dear colleagues, I think that this discussion about phenomenology, or better said phenomenological philosophy, is essential, but may go in the wrong direction. As for the common grounds that Loet

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism

2015-08-02 Thread Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
. Ulanowicz Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:04 AM To: Joseph Brenner Cc: fis Subject: Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism Dear Joseph et al., I'm afraid I can't comment on the adequacy Husserlian phenomenology, as I never could get very far into Hursserl. I would

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism

2015-08-02 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
- From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Robert E. Ulanowicz Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:04 AM To: Joseph Brenner Cc: fis Subject: Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism Dear Joseph et al., I'm afraid I can't comment on the adequacy Husserlian

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark

2015-08-02 Thread Marcos Ortega Luis de
De: Fis fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es en nombre de Pedro C. Marijuan pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es Enviado: viernes, 31 de julio de 2015 14:38 Para: 'fis' Asunto: Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark Dear Fernando, Luis, and FIS colleagues, In a few days the list will take

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism

2015-08-02 Thread Francesco Rizzo
? Best, Loet -Original Message- From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Robert E. Ulanowicz Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:04 AM To: Joseph Brenner Cc: fis Subject: Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism Dear Joseph et al

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark

2015-08-01 Thread Mark Johnson
Dear Fernando, Without wanting to spawn a new debate, I think it might be useful to flag something up about the 'phenomenology' that you mention. I understand Joseph's reaction to what to you say and I agree. However, phenomenology is a rich a complex topic, and few scholars have the tenacity to

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism

2015-08-01 Thread Joseph Brenner
intersubjective context where its utility can be seen. For discussion, I hope. Best, Joseph - Original Message - From: Mark Johnson To: fis Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 1:18 PM Subject: Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark Dear Fernando, Without wanting to spawn a new debate, I

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark. Phenomenology and Speculative Realism

2015-08-01 Thread Robert E. Ulanowicz
Dear Joseph et al., I'm afraid I can't comment on the adequacy Husserlian phenomenology, as I never could get very far into Hursserl. I would just add that there is also a variety of phenomenology associated with thermodynamics and engineering. The generic meaning of phenomenology is the study

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark

2015-07-31 Thread Pedro C. Marijuan
Dear Fernando, Luis, and FIS colleagues, In a few days the list will take vacations (it is our tradition that in August we do not make discussions). At your convenience, around next week better, you are invited to make some concluding comments if you find them opportune. The discussion has

[Fis] Answer to Mark

2015-07-30 Thread Fernando Flores
Dear Mark Thanks for your commentaries. Our use of the term foundational is more philosophical than practical. You are right; the term contradicts in some sense our intentions which are very practical. (This is a term which we could leave behind without hesitation.) In fact, we have no

Re: [Fis] Answer to Mark

2015-07-30 Thread Joseph Brenner
Message - From: Fernando Flores To: fis@listas.unizar.es Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 10:17 AM Subject: [Fis] Answer to Mark Dear Mark Thanks for your commentaries. Our use of the term foundational is more philosophical than practical. You are right; the term contradicts