Re: [Fis] Cognitive Effects of Cognitive Research: Photographic evidence

2013-02-23 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
Dear Bob, 

I now read the book: the description of autocatalysis is very convincing. It
really clarifies how a triple helix (of university-industry-government
relations) can operate in generating synergy (reducing uncertainty). 

You then go on with Average Mutual Information (AMI). You don't mention
that AMI (that most of us call mutual information) is necessary positive
since a Shannon-type information, but that mutual information in more than
two dimensions can be negative and thus used as an indicator of synergy or
autocatalysis.

I usually make reference for this to Ulanowicz (1986, pp. 143 ff.). Is that
methodologically the same argument? I assume so. Or have you taken these
measurement issues also further?

Best,
Loet


Loet Leydesdorff 
Professor, University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR), 
Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam. 
Tel.: +31-20- 525 6598; fax: +31-842239111
l...@leydesdorff.net ; http://www.leydesdorff.net/ ;
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en 

-Original Message-
From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Robert Ulanowicz
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:44 PM
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] Cognitive Effects of Cognitive Research: Photographic
evidence

I'm most grateful to both Bob L. for sharing his manuscript with FIS and to
Loet for his new ms on 3-D mutual information. (I am on the road, but will
read it as soon as I return home.)

It's so gratifying to live long enough to see these leads in information
theory taken up by others and improved upon. I've been working with them for
over 30 years, and it was beginning to look as though my interest had been
in vain. Thanks so much for paying attention!

Most now dismiss Shannon-type information as incapable of treating
meaning, when, in fact, we have only begun to fathom the potentialities of
multi-dimensional and conditional forms of the Shannon formulation.
Carry-on!

There is an ambiguity in the meaning of redundancy in IT that I perhaps am
responsible for. Conventional IT refers to redundancy as repetition of
outcomes. In that sense it is connected with mutual information. I have
always used the term to refer to multiplicity of pathways, or functional
redundancy (as Henri Atlan called it). In that sense it is quantified by
the conditional entropy. Of course, mutual information and conditional
entropy are complementary attributes. I think Loet is using redundancy in
the traditional sense.

Ed is quite correct in his disagreement with the 3rd Window. He has
convinced me that most of what I had labeled Newtonian in my book was more
the work of Leibniz and Euler of the school of Berliner Mechanik. I now
labor to set the record straight.

Best regards to all!
Bob U.

Quoting Loet Leydesdorff l...@leydesdorff.net:

 Dear Bob,



 I should perhaps have clarified that in the text of which I sent the 
 abstract around yesterday, I formulate at p. 10 (in honour of Bob 
 Ulanowicz) as follows:



 With the same enthusiasm which Krippendorff (2009a) reports about 
 Ashby (1969), one of us embraced this potentially negative sign in the 
 mutual information in three dimensions as an indicator of potential 
 reduction of uncertainty in Triple-Helix configurations once it was 
 brought to his attention by Robert Ulanowicz, who had used the same 
 indicator in the context of his ascendancy theory in mathematical biology
(Ulanowicz, 1986:
 143). This same indicator is used across disciplines (see for an overview:
 Jakulin, 2005) and sometimes called configurational information, but 
 it has remained controversial because it is poorly understood. As 
 noted, a signed information measure cannot be interpreted in Shannon 
 information theory, whereas alternative frameworks for its 
 appreciation have remained ill-defined (Krippendorff, 1980, 2009a and b).



 arXiv:1301.6849 http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6849  [pdf 
 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.6849 ]

 Mutual Redundancies in Inter-human Communication Systems: Steps 
 Towards a Calculus of Processing Meaning



 Does the issue return in the book? Our argument is that this mutual 
 information is a redundancy and can then be integrated into the 
 framework of the mathematical theory of communication.



 Best wishes,

 Loet



   _

 Loet Leydesdorff

 Professor, University of Amsterdam
 Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR), Kloveniersburgwal 
 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam.
 Tel.: +31-20- 525 6598; fax: +31-842239111  
 mailto:l...@leydesdorff.net l...@leydesdorff.net ; 
 http://www.leydesdorff.net/ http://www.leydesdorff.net/ ; 
 http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en
 http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en



 From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es 
 [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Bob Logan
 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:02 AM
 To: fis
 Subject: Re: [Fis] Cognitive Effects of Cognitive Research

Re: [Fis] Cognitive Effects of Cognitive Research: Photographic evidence

2013-01-31 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
Dear Bob, 

 

I should perhaps have clarified that in the text of which I sent the
abstract around yesterday, I formulate at p. 10 (in honour of Bob Ulanowicz)
as follows:

 

With the same enthusiasm which Krippendorff (2009a) reports about Ashby
(1969), one of us embraced this potentially negative sign in the mutual
information in three dimensions as an indicator of potential reduction of
uncertainty in Triple-Helix configurations once it was brought to his
attention by Robert Ulanowicz, who had used the same indicator in the
context of his ascendancy theory in mathematical biology (Ulanowicz, 1986:
143). This same indicator is used across disciplines (see for an overview:
Jakulin, 2005) and sometimes called configurational information, but it
has remained controversial because it is poorly understood. As noted, a
signed information measure cannot be interpreted in Shannon information
theory, whereas alternative frameworks for its appreciation have remained
ill-defined (Krippendorff, 1980, 2009a and b).

 

arXiv:1301.6849 http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6849  [pdf
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.6849 ]

Mutual Redundancies in Inter-human Communication Systems: Steps Towards a
Calculus of Processing Meaning 

 

Does the issue return in the book? Our argument is that this mutual
information is a redundancy and can then be integrated into the framework
of the mathematical theory of communication.

 

Best wishes, 

Loet

 

  _  

Loet Leydesdorff 

Professor, University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR), 
Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam. 
Tel.: +31-20- 525 6598; fax: +31-842239111
 mailto:l...@leydesdorff.net l...@leydesdorff.net ;
http://www.leydesdorff.net/ http://www.leydesdorff.net/ ;
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en 

 

From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Bob Logan
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:02 AM
To: fis
Subject: Re: [Fis] Cognitive Effects of Cognitive Research: Photographic
evidence

 

Dear Colleagues - I was very moved by Robert Ulanowicz's book A Third Window
- I saw parallels with the work of McLuhan and a project I co-authored with
Stuart Kauffman and others. That resulted in the attached paper. Some of you
on FIS  will receive this email post twice as I do not know who all is on
FIS - I am sending this post to all folks that were copied on emails to or
from Robert Ulanowicz.

I hope you will find time to read my paper and sent me your comments. If you
like this paper I have another that I submitted to Zygon that deals with
matters spiritual and theological also stimulated by Robert Ulanowicz's A
3rd Window. I would be happy to send it to you.

 

with kind regards to all - Bob Logan

 

___
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis


Re: [Fis] Cognitive Effects of Cognitive Research: Photographic evidence

2013-01-31 Thread Robert Ulanowicz
I'm most grateful to both Bob L. for sharing his manuscript with FIS  
and to Loet for his new ms on 3-D mutual information. (I am on the  
road, but will read it as soon as I return home.)

It's so gratifying to live long enough to see these leads in  
information theory taken up by others and improved upon. I've been  
working with them for over 30 years, and it was beginning to look as  
though my interest had been in vain. Thanks so much for paying  
attention!

Most now dismiss Shannon-type information as incapable of treating  
meaning, when, in fact, we have only begun to fathom the  
potentialities of multi-dimensional and conditional forms of the  
Shannon formulation. Carry-on!

There is an ambiguity in the meaning of redundancy in IT that I  
perhaps am responsible for. Conventional IT refers to redundancy as  
repetition of outcomes. In that sense it is connected with mutual  
information. I have always used the term to refer to multiplicity of  
pathways, or functional redundancy (as Henri Atlan called it). In  
that sense it is quantified by the conditional entropy. Of course,  
mutual information and conditional entropy are complementary  
attributes. I think Loet is using redundancy in the traditional sense.

Ed is quite correct in his disagreement with the 3rd Window. He has  
convinced me that most of what I had labeled Newtonian in my book  
was more the work of Leibniz and Euler of the school of Berliner  
Mechanik. I now labor to set the record straight.

Best regards to all!
Bob U.

Quoting Loet Leydesdorff l...@leydesdorff.net:

 Dear Bob,



 I should perhaps have clarified that in the text of which I sent the
 abstract around yesterday, I formulate at p. 10 (in honour of Bob Ulanowicz)
 as follows:



 With the same enthusiasm which Krippendorff (2009a) reports about Ashby
 (1969), one of us embraced this potentially negative sign in the mutual
 information in three dimensions as an indicator of potential reduction of
 uncertainty in Triple-Helix configurations once it was brought to his
 attention by Robert Ulanowicz, who had used the same indicator in the
 context of his ascendancy theory in mathematical biology (Ulanowicz, 1986:
 143). This same indicator is used across disciplines (see for an overview:
 Jakulin, 2005) and sometimes called configurational information, but it
 has remained controversial because it is poorly understood. As noted, a
 signed information measure cannot be interpreted in Shannon information
 theory, whereas alternative frameworks for its appreciation have remained
 ill-defined (Krippendorff, 1980, 2009a and b).



 arXiv:1301.6849 http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6849  [pdf
 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.6849 ]

 Mutual Redundancies in Inter-human Communication Systems: Steps Towards a
 Calculus of Processing Meaning



 Does the issue return in the book? Our argument is that this mutual
 information is a redundancy and can then be integrated into the framework
 of the mathematical theory of communication.



 Best wishes,

 Loet



   _

 Loet Leydesdorff

 Professor, University of Amsterdam
 Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR),
 Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam.
 Tel.: +31-20- 525 6598; fax: +31-842239111
  mailto:l...@leydesdorff.net l...@leydesdorff.net ;
 http://www.leydesdorff.net/ http://www.leydesdorff.net/ ;
 http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en
 http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en



 From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
 Behalf Of Bob Logan
 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:02 AM
 To: fis
 Subject: Re: [Fis] Cognitive Effects of Cognitive Research: Photographic
 evidence



 Dear Colleagues - I was very moved by Robert Ulanowicz's book A Third Window
 - I saw parallels with the work of McLuhan and a project I co-authored with
 Stuart Kauffman and others. That resulted in the attached paper. Some of you
 on FIS  will receive this email post twice as I do not know who all is on
 FIS - I am sending this post to all folks that were copied on emails to or
 from Robert Ulanowicz.

 I hope you will find time to read my paper and sent me your comments. If you
 like this paper I have another that I submitted to Zygon that deals with
 matters spiritual and theological also stimulated by Robert Ulanowicz's A
 3rd Window. I would be happy to send it to you.



 with kind regards to all - Bob Logan







___
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis