Re: [Fis] Krassimir's Notes . . .

2015-06-21 Thread Moisés André Nisenbaum
Hi, Howard. Answering your question hb: i'm a newcomer to these discussions. what is the fourth great domain of science? Might be useful also for who came in the FIS list after 2015 IS4IS Summit. The last discussion before the conference, was A Dialog on the Informational as the 4th Great Domain

Re: [Fis] Krassimir's Notes . . .

2015-06-19 Thread Pedro C. Marijuan
Dear Howard and FIS colleagues, Many thanks for your exciting comments; dealing first with Koichiro's intriguing point on action and probabilities, I think it links with the Quantum Bayesianism we discused last year in the list (von Baeyer's FIS New Year Lecture), and also with Karl

Re: [Fis] Krassimir's Notes . . .

2015-06-18 Thread Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Fantasies about Quantum Mechanics aside, Probability and Information are distinct. Both are ways of speaking about the world. You may speak of alternatives probabilistically, but you cannot say that “information is probabilistic. Any truth based system is necessarily flawed (Godel) and

Re: [Fis] Krassimir's Notes . . .

2015-06-17 Thread Koichiro Matsuno
At 9:36 PM 06/17/2015, Pedro wrote: ... What if information belongs to action, [KM] This is a good remark suggesting that information may go beyond the standard stipulation of first-order logic. A great advantage of mathematics grounded upon first-order logic is to enjoy the provability or