Dear Colleagues, Selecting process of the papers for GIT 2011 is done and main papers are in print in International Journal "Information Theories and Applications", Vol.18, Numbers 1 and 2.
Only for FIS the PDF variant if these numbers are available at: http://www.ithea.org/fis/ Welcome in Varna! I kindly ask participants to inform me ASAP about travel details and accommodation preferences. Friendly regards Krassimir -----Original Message----- From: karl javorszky Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:13 PM To: Pedro C. Marijuan Cc: fis@listas.unizar.es Subject: [Fis] end of session Very Unfrequently Asked Questions We have proposed a rethink of the procedure of additions. We state that setting a1+b1=c=a2+b2 with a1#a2 (that is, saying that between 2+5 and 3+4 there is no real difference and ignoring this difference carries no costs and working on this difference is a waste of time) is a crude rounding. We say that the concept of additions merits a revisiting and that not accepting a rounding error (which we commit by setting 6+11=8+9) greatly improves our ability to count more exactly. Furthermore, looking into the interdependences of additions allows us to model Nature in fruitful ways. This idea has been repeated and repeated again, with a very elaborate numeric Table as demonstrational tool. So far, the response has been rather hesitant. Questions in the following fields could help to find the useful behind the unexpected: 1. Psychology 2. Numerical 3. Nature 4. Sociology 5. Applications and Business Let me help the reader by offering a structure by which understanding the concept of a+b=c becomes easier. The following are questions that could well be raised: 1.1. Is this an explanation in the sense of the term “explanation” as used in epistemology and psychology? 1.2. What is the novelty value of the invention? 1.3. Is it reasonable that the normal reader of the concept goes into resistance? 1.4. Is it to be expected that the normal reader of the concept goes tilt (becomes mute)? 1.5. Is the rounding error connected to thinking one-dimensionally, similarity-oriented? 1.6. What is the relation between foreground and background? 2.1. Is a sequence 1,2,3,… one-dimensional? 2.2. Are additions generally seen as one-dimensional? 2.3. Is a sorting procedure a specific partition of the set? 2.4. Does the difference between a and b translate into a linear position in the set? 2.5. What is a maximally structured set? 2.6. Why 136? 2.7. Does the set leak above 136? 2.8. Is the search path to individual elements differently long in multidimensional sets? 3.1. Is the DNA traditionally seen in the literature as one-dimensional? 3.2. Does the model offer two logically and physically different sub-spaces with 3 rectangular axes each? 3.3. Can the two sub-spaces be merged into one, Newtonian, space? 3.4. Does the model show spatial properties of objects to be translatable into mass properties? 3.5. Does the model offer clear definitions for properties of time? 3.6. Are the spatial points thru which strings run a concept for mass? 3.7. Could the spatial geometry of molecules be understood by means of the model? 4.1. Has the usage of additions heretofore been an ex cathedra dogma? 4.2. Is the insistence on the irrelevance of the difference between 2+4 and 3+3 a cultural heritage? 4.3. Is the concept of the right hierarchy connected to experiences transmitted by the gravitation? 4.4. Is it usual to be very angry with someone who makes the system as understood so far collapse? 4.5. Why has this so-called “invention” not been invented so far? 5.1. Can I publish very many papers if I understand before others what is a+b=c? 5.2. Is this the time to jump the band-wagon? 5.3. Is there anything to publish left for me? 5.4. Is this stuff good to sell to the general public? 5.5. Has anyone made a Book Of Additions with many colourful drawings yet? 5.6. About 1% of the population of the Earth is a mathematician. Is that a market? 5.7. Could this idea work in the fashion (using the principle) like the neurons integrate information? 5.8. Would it be profitable to have such a Table on both ends of a communication channel? 5.8. Are there inventions ready to patent if only I ask for a private meeting? Varna is a nice town, specifically end of June. I shall be there from the 21st till the 26th and look forward to any of these questions. It would be friendly of you if you could advise about which you would like to work on. Of course, I will do my best if you come up with some other questions, but of course it is open if I can give you an answer to those. Looking forward an interesting exchange: Karl _______________________________________________ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis _______________________________________________ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis