> On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:02 PM, Andrei Khrennikov
> wrote:
> Life is hard... I am afraid that it is impossible to put this qualifier in
> front "information" used in recent information approaches to quantum
> mechanics.
> For Zeilinger and Brukner (this is my private impression from private
Dear Marcus,
>>I would ask for clarification on whether you speak of "information" in
>> your examples as something that has innate "meaning" or something that is
>> innately >>"meaningless" . . . which has been a core issue in earlier
>> exchanges. If this issue of "meaning" versus
