Pridi, Krassimir, List:
(In order to place this comment in context, and for reference, I have copied
Krassimir's "definition" of information below. My comments follow the excellent
post of Pridi.)
> In physical world there exist only reflections but not information.
>
> Information “ i " is
Dear Krassimir,
Thank you for your explanation. It does give me a better understanding of how
information (beyond Shannon) can be formalized! However, a closer look at the
formalism and its semantic does raise new questions:
From the definition you have given, it appears that information cannot
List, Krassimir:
(I have posted Krassimir's response below, since it may not have been
distributed to the list.)
My question was not a metaphysical question about materiality, my body and
other such philosophical question of import.
Rather, it is direct question about the sufficiency of the rh
List, Karassimir:
I found your definition of information to be a bit confusing because the
language is a bit ambiguous to me.
While the definitions of the quadruple "make sense" from a rhetorical sense,
one notion that is missing is the concept of what is the meaning of the
central reference
Dear Pridi,
An accordance with my understanding:
In physical world there exist only reflections but not information.
Information “i" is the quadruple:
i = (s, r, e, I)
where
s is a source entity, which is reflected in r
r is the entity in which reflection of s exists
e is an evidence for the sub
