Hi Bob,
One of the classic studies:
*The study of information: interdisciplinary messages*
Editors:Fritz Machlup
http://dl.acm.org/author_page.cfm?id=81100466573coll=DLdl=ACMtrk=0cfid=677888792cftoken=53847757Una
Mansfield
I believe Moises meant this email for Pedro and all of fis so I am copying you
with my reply to Moises
On 2015-05-24, at 7:17 AM, Moisés André Nisenbaum wrote:
Hi, Pedro, Bob and FISers.
It is interesting that the original post lead us to a variety of very
important subjects. Thank you
Bob-- As one who has strayed from the Darwinian discipline of evolutionary
biology (my erstwhile field), I can say that I have 'paid the price'. But I
have had a wonderful time exploring wherever my thinking has gone. I think
the discipline has in a sense guided me anyway, as turning away from it
Dear Colleagues - I have been reading the posts in this thread and enjoying the
conversation. I started playing with the notion of discipline and came up with
these undisciplined playful thoughts which I believe provide an interesting or
at least an alternative perspective on the notion of a
Physics students in Brazil do not read much about philosophy. They should
read more :-). I remember I thought that the physical universe was entirely
explained by mathematics. I found out later, for example, a huge number of
mathematically possible universes. Then, I was then presented to the
*A Dialog on the Informational as the 4th Great Domain of Science*
*Moisés André Nisenbaum Ken Herold*
*/PART 1: /**/Informational as the 4th Great Domain of Science/*
(Moisés André Nisenbaum)
To classify is human (BOWKER STAR 2000). The organization of
scientific knowledge is concern of
