Dear Bruno,
You have brought up a vitally important question.
Thank you so very much.
Best wishes
Alex
RE Bruno: How could the quantum correlations existence be definite if
nothing is objective?
ME: It does not really matter what the nature of the reality is, either
strongly objective (denied
RE Bruno Marchal: Gödel's theorem implies that machines which are looking
at themselves (in a precise technical sense) develop a series of distinct
phenomenologies (arguably corresponding to justifiable, knowable,
observable, sensible).
ME: I find this a fascinating observation in that you are
On 02 May 2016, at 03:38, Maxine Sheets-Johnstone wrote:
To all concerned colleagues,
I appreciate the fact that discussions should be conversations about
issues,
but this particular issue and in particular the critique cited in my
posting
warrant extended exposition in order to show the
Hi Alex,
On 02 May 2016, at 08:30, Alex Hankey wrote:
RE Bruno Marchal: It is easier to explain the illusion of matter to
something conscious than to explain the illusion of consciousness to
something material.
ME: At the Consciousness Conference I found it extraordinary that at
least
RE Bruno Marchal: It is easier to explain the illusion of matter to
something conscious than to explain the illusion of consciousness to
something material.
ME: At the Consciousness Conference I found it extraordinary that at least
one plenary presentation was centered round treating the wave
Dear FISers,
After the Summer pause it is time to start with the discussion sessions
again. This is the tentative calendar for next months:
-- CHEMOINFORMATION (and molecular recognition), by Michel Petitjean
-- INFORMATION SCIENCE TEACHING, by Marcin Schroeder Gordana
Dodig-Crnkovic
