]
Betreff:
Re: [Fis] definitions of information
Von:
Rafael Capurro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum:
Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:01:12 +0100
Stanley
I think this is less a question of "grand theories" than of persons and
interests. In this list the natural scientists are in the major
Pedro said --
> Dear FIS colleagues,
>
> Adding to Bob's and Karl's on Shannonian info, I am still under the
>influence of Seth Lloyd (one of the founders of quantum computation)
>insights about inf physics. For him, the second law is but a statement
>about information processing, how the underly
Dear FIS colleagues,
Adding to Bob's and Karl's on Shannonian info, I am still under the
influence of Seth Lloyd (one of the founders of quantum computation)
insights about inf physics. For him, the second law is but a statement
about information processing, how the underlying physical dynamic
Commenting upon Pedro's"
>Dear FIS colleagues,
>
>Sorry that I could barely follow and participate in the recent exchanges
>(bureaucratic work overload). I was very interested in all the exchanges,
>particularly in the early stages of the discussion. Notwithstanding the
>high quality of the postin
> 8. Any social, cultural, individual, neuronal, etc., visions or
> acceptations of meaning finally conduce to life cycles
> in-the-making and
> confronting an open ended environment.
>
> 9. Meaning can only be about life, around the multiple
> dimensions of fitness.
Dear Pedro,
In my opini
Dear FIS colleagues,
Sorry that I could barely follow and participate in the recent exchanges
(bureaucratic work overload). I was very interested in all the exchanges,
particularly in the early stages of the discussion. Notwithstanding the
high quality of the postings maybe we have a natural p
