Re: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information”

2017-03-28 Thread John Collier
John Collier Emeritus Professor and Senior Research Associate Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal http://web.ncf.ca/collier From: John Collier Sent: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 9:39 AM To: 'darvasg' <darv...@iif.hu> Subject: RE: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information” I

Re: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information”

2017-03-25 Thread darvasg
Dear Krassimir, They can For details, see my contrinution to the 2015 Vienna IS4IS meeting and following publications of the proceedings! Best, Gyuri 24.03.2017 16:25 időpontban Krassimir Markov ezt írta: > Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues, > Let me remember that: > The basic

Re: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information”

2017-03-24 Thread Karl Javorszky
1) Let me second to the point Alex raises: machines, computers, do exchange information. It would be against cultural conventions to say that the notification that the refrigerator sends to your phone's app "to-do-list" of the content "milk only 0.5 liter available" is not an information. The

Re: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information”

2017-03-24 Thread Alex Hankey
BUT, in common parlance, computers and mobile phones 'exchange information' (in the abstract, digital sense) all the time. Including this email. If you wish to cleanly restrict yourself to semantic content, the the form of information that I presented to FiS a year ago offers the only

Re: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information”

2017-03-24 Thread Lars-Göran Johansson
24 mars 2017 kl. 16:25 skrev Krassimir Markov >: Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues, Let me remember that: The basic misunderstanding that non-living objects could “exchange information” leads to many principal theoretical as well as psychological

[Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information”

2017-03-24 Thread Krassimir Markov
Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues, Let me remember that: The basic misunderstanding that non-living objects could “exchange information” leads to many principal theoretical as well as psychological faults. For instance, photon could exchange only energy and/or reflections ! Sorry for this n-th