Hi Pedro,
Jeremy Sherman here, a long-time pirate. Pleased to meet you. You say:
I am also critical with the autogenesis model systems--wouldn't it be far
clearer approaching a (relatively) simple prokaryotic cell and discuss upon
its intertwining of the communication and self-produ
the research, in the doing, is as Terry implies as
modest any careful scientific work.
Jeremy Sherman
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Moisés André Nisenbaum <
moises.nisenb...@ifrj.edu.br> wrote:
> Hi, Pedro.
> I didnt receive th image (Figure 1. The Four Great Domains of Scie
Amen.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Marcus Abundis <55m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From Loet's post:
> >During the recent conference in Vienna, I was amazed how many of our
> colleagues wish to ground information in physics.<
> I would say that I was disappointed . . .
>
> For me this exchange on
Deacon addressed this all very clearly in his January paper. I'm guessing
for most FIS members his argument changed little or nothing.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Stanley N Salthe
wrote:
> Loet -- Well, so you favor the definition of information as an invention
> of Western technology rela
stillations are a new
way to get clear about what he's actually proposing.
Best,
Jeremy Sherman
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
g to share what that shift was I'd welcome a brief
description. Also if you have any insights into why you had that shift, for
example, what someone said.
Thanks,
Jeremy Sherman
Author, Neither Ghost Nor Machine: The emergence and nature of selves.
___
