Responding to Igor -- I don't see how information can be a fundamental
category along with space, time, matter -- because it is a triadic concept,
requiring a system of interpretance that considers certain configurations
of matter in space and/or time to be significant. So, a complixated
: Stanley N. Salthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FIS] Re: Concluding replies
Commenting on Arne's posting, with which I substantially agree. I find it
useful to construct a specification hierarchy of 'realms of nature' (each
of which is a cultural construct), as:
{physical dynamics {material
Richard -- A good question! Note first that my statement is minimalist in
order just to note its large difference from the other two common
conceptions of information.
Now, in order to see that the genetic system would come under this general
usage of information as carrying meaning, we need to
Steven's criticisms of of Joseph's text are good ones. I would like to
address one question he raises:
I feel a clear definition of complexity is missing from Tainter's
discussion and I see distinct concepts being confused. I find myself, for
example, wanting a clear specification of complexity
Using my last posting for the week, I will support Guy's posting below: As
I pointed out in my 1985 book on scale/compositional hierarchically
organized systems, the fact that different levels cannot dynamically
interact (must be separated by order of magnitude differences if they ARE
to be
This is my reply to Jerry (acknowledging that John's reply to Jerry below
says it as well as -- probably better than -- I can), who said:
Stan's comment deserves to be attended to.
The many complexities facing us as society can be parsed as follows,
using a
specification hierarcy:
{physical
Replying to LOET, who said:
Dear colleagues,I agree with most of what is said, but it does not
apply to social systems because these -- and to a lesser extent also
psychological ones -- operate differently from the hierarchical
formations that are generated naturally. That is why we
Replying to Pedro, who said:
Those hierarchical schemes that with a few categories cover realms and
realms of knowledge have an undeniable allure --but are they useful?
S: This depends upon the meaning of useful. As my work is in
Natural Philosophy, they are useful there in the sense of
and adjacent probable. If
this is correct, then it would seem to render the economy as almost pure
information. In fact, I think it would render all emergent systems as
pure information. Wouldn't it?
Regards,
Guy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stanley N. Salthe
Sent
Pedro notes :
Thanks, Stan and others.
Very briefly, I was thinking on the economy (together with most of social
structure) as the arrows or bonds that connect the nodes of
individuals. Take away the arrows, the bonds, and you are left with a mere
swarm of structureless, gregarious individuals.
Commenting on Robin's text, he said:
In this paper I combine and extend some ideas of Daniel Dennett with
one from Wittgenstein and another from physics. Dennett introduced the
concepts of the physical, design and intentional stances (1987), and
has suggested (with John Haugeland) that â*some
Continuing with Robin --
Thursday, March 15, 2007, 7:46:47 PM, Stanley wrote:
Commenting on Robin's text, he said:
In this paper I combine and extend some ideas of Daniel Dennett with
one from Wittgenstein and another from physics. Dennett introduced the
concepts of the physical, design and
Pedro said --
Dear FIS colleagues,
It was nice seeing these artistic oriented presentations (including Stan's!
--I sort of remember having read a few years ago an elegant poem of him on
entropy... am I right?).
et puis,
je hésite --
je refuse
d'avoir
First I comment on Pedro's:
The information overload theme (in the evolution of social modes of
communication), is really intriguing. Should we take it, say, in its
prima facie? I am inclined to put it into question, at least to have an
excuse and try to unturn that pretty stone...
The question
Here I react to Guy's
Greetings All,
In my view meaning exists (or not) exclusively within systems. It
exists to the extent that inputs (incoming information) resonate within
the structure of the system. The resonance can either reinforce the
existing architecture (confirmation),
Bob said:
Hi Stan - interesting ideas - I resonate with the thought that the
meaning of info is associated with Aritostle's final cause - cheers Bob
Here I follow up with an extract from a text I am working on at present,
just to amplify this a bit more:
Finally, what is the justification for
Commenting upon Pedro's
Dear FIS colleagues,
Sorry that I could barely follow and participate in the recent exchanges
(bureaucratic work overload). I was very interested in all the exchanges,
particularly in the early stages of the discussion. Notwithstanding the
high quality of the postings
Commenting first on Bob's and then on Karl's:
Bob said--
Dear colleagues - please forgive my lapse in communications. I have been
studying the question of Shannon info and have come up with the following
thoughts I want to share with you. As always comments are solicited.
Rather than answering
Pedro said --
Dear FIS colleagues,
Adding to Bob's and Karl's on Shannonian info, I am still under the
influence of Seth Lloyd (one of the founders of quantum computation)
insights about inf physics. For him, the second law is but a statement
about information processing, how the underlying
Steven --
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Ericsson Zenith ste...@semeiosis.org
Date: Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:56 PM
Subject: [Fis] On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton
To: Foundations of Information Science Information Science
fis@listas.unizar.es
Dear
Has anyone suggested the function of contact sports to be the 'moral
equivalent' of war. Many young men requires this kind of excitement because
of their hormone mix.
STAN
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es wrote:
Dear FISers,
Looking for an
Pedro -- This sentiment seems odd to me. This is because I have retired to
an out-of-the-way rural area and no longer travel to conferences, and so my
only contact with other than family members is through e-mail, including
lists. And my wife does all our communications with the locals. I do NOT
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.eduwrote:
Regarding the question: What is your
opinion about Leroy E. Hood' words: Biology Is an
Informational Science?
In a general sense the meaning is that, although every locale in the world
is mediated by history
Folks --
Comments upon Kirby’s Brenner’s ‘Opening Remarks’
(1) I used Conrad’s early information-based work in developing my conception
of the scale/compositional hierarchy as applied to material systems. As a
materialist, I may have ‘mis-read’ his work. I think this now, upon
glimpsing
Replying to Kevin --
On Tuesday, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Kevin Kirby ki...@nku.edu wrote:
-snip-
On flows across scales, this itself need not be mysterious. Take a single
photon hitting a rhodopsin molecule in the retina of a vertebrate then
[...long chain here...] triggering a
in the current context? Isn’t the important thing that information
often does percolate across levels?
Regards,
Guy
On 10/1/10 1:23 PM, Stanley N. Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu wrote:
Replying to Kevin --
On Tuesday, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Kevin Kirby ki...@nku.edu mailto:
ki...@nku.edu
Replying to Guy --
You are right. My favorite examples of signals moving across scales
(e.g.,direct interactions) are (a) lightning, where a signal from the planet
scale system directly contacts an organism at a lower scale, and (b) cancer,
where a single cell can destroy a multicellular
I would like to comment upon Conrad's statement:
When we look at a biological system we are looking at the face of the
underlying physics of the universe... The picture is not one of
simple upscale percolation. The higher levels act down scale on the
lower levels to redefine their fundamental
-boun...@listas.unizar.es]
*On Behalf Of *Stanley N Salthe
*Sent:* Friday, October 15, 2010 3:35 PM
*To:* fis@listas.unizar.es
*Subject:* Re: [Fis] Recapping the discussion? Joseph's Recap
I would like to comment upon Conrad's statement:
When we look at a biological system we are looking
Loet --
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Loet Leydesdorff l...@leydesdorff.net
wrote:
Dear Stan,
Wasn’t it Tycho Brahe’s suscipio descipiendo, descipio suscipiendo? Nothing
but uncertainty; if order emerges, selection mechanisms must have been
specified.
S: If uncertainty emerges,
Jorge -- Then, it is hard to get away from the model where, in 'downward
causation', large scale signals impact simultaneously many small scale
processes, while in upward causation, small scale signals need to accumulate
into some kind of ensemble message. But Conrad 'fluctuons' seem to be
trying
Bob --
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Robert Ulanowicz u...@umces.edu wrote
Subject: Re: [Fis] Tactilizing processing
To: Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
Cc: u...@cbl.umces.edu
Quoting Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu:
I suggested that a single small scale
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
Date: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] [Fwd: Discussion Colophon] From J.Brenner
To: Pedro C. Marijuan pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
A comment on Joseph's concluding statement: It seems clear to me
Of *Stanley N Salthe
*Sent:* Thursday, November 04, 2010 3:05 PM
*To:* fis@listas.unizar.es
*Subject:* [Fis] Fwd: [Fwd: Discussion Colophon] From J.Brenner
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Stanley N Salthe* ssal...@binghamton.edu
Date: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis
[mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es]
*On Behalf Of *Stanley N Salthe
*Sent:* den 13 november 2010 23:03
*To:* fis@listas.unizar.es
*Subject:* Re: [Fis] INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION (by Y.X.Zhong)
Concerning:
The minimal claim would be that there is no intelligence without
information. For an agent
Folks -- This cut is Figure 1 from
Sejnowsky, T., 2006. The computational self. * Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences* 1001: 262-271.
Note that the levels are found to be orders of magnitude different in size.
No change in any single unit at any level can have an effect at the next
discussion (Stanley N Salthe)
*From: *Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
*Date: *November 20, 2010 9:18:18 AM EST
*To: *...@listas.unizar.es
*Subject: **[Fis] footnote to fluctuon discussion*
Folks -- This cut is Figure 1 from
Sejnowsky, T., 2006. The computational self. * Annals
As my second posting for the week:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
Date: Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Doctrine of Limitation
To: Pedro C. Marijuan pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Replying to Pedro, who asked:
Optimality
Replying to Walter --
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:41 PM, walter.riof...@terra.com.pe wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
It seems that a good start point is to look at the “dissipative structures
world”.
And we could ask if in every dissipative structure it is possible to find
information
and/or
*Replying to Karl, who said:*
one can use a stable model used by neurology and psychology to come closer
to understanding how our brain works. This can help to formulate the
thoughts Pedro mentioned being obscure.
One pictures the brain as a quasi-meteorological model of an extended world
| University of Maryland
University of Florida | Email u...@cbl.umces.edu
Gainesville, FL 32611-8525 USA | Web http://www.cbl.umces.edu/~ulan
--
Quoting Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu:
*Replying
As my last for this week:
Replying to Walter -- The dark matter and dark energy examples are not very
strong as examples of demonstrating discoveries rather than invention!
These are stand-ins, just names, for disparities between predictions and
observations. They are provisionally (I hope!)
Replying to Loet --
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Loet Leydesdorff l...@leydesdorff.netwrote:
Replying to Loet --
Your distinction between the backward looking institutional viewpoint
and the forward looking evolutionary perspective is cogent, but it plays
down the fact that the
One of the most special properties of science -- indeed its core that
differentiates it from natural philosophy -- is the practice of testing
hypotheses. Leaving aside the 'human' weaknesses involved here, there is,
however, the 'Duhem-Quine thesis' to be faced. In order to test an
hypothesis,
Tagging on after Joseph --
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:19 PM, joe.bren...@bluewin.ch
joe.bren...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Dear Pedro and All,
Thank you for your note and the ambitious program. My brief comments by
theme:
--Theme 1: Historical Foundations of Modern Science.
Sounds very
Gavin -- I send this reply to you, but, since we on this list are allowed
only two messages per week, I will reserve sending it to the list until
later in the week.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Gavin Ritz garr...@xtra.co.nz wrote:
Hi there Stan
SS: Info theory presumably applies to
Robin --
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Robin Faichney ro...@robinfaichney.orgwrote:
Saturday, January 29, 2011, 9:39:09 PM, Stanley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Gavin Ritz garr...@xtra.co.nz wrote:
SS: Info theory presumably applies to everything and anything.
GR: It was
As u first for the week:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Gavin Ritz garr...@xtra.co.nz wrote:
Hi Stan
Using my last message for the week,
Reacting to the below(s): As a materialist, I see the deformations
initiated by Guy's propagated waves (e.g., as sensations) as forming the
basis for
Replying to Jerry (with implications for the postings of our Chinese
members) --
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Jerry LR Chandler jerry_lr_chand...@me.com
wrote:
(Pedro: Please Post to FIS)
James Hannam, Stan, Pedro, List:
Thank you for taking the time to express your point of view. For
As my first posting for this week --
Replying to Steven --
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Steven Ericsson-Zenith
ste...@semeiosis.org wrote:
On Mar 12, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Stanley N Salthe wrote:
...
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Steven Ericsson-Zenith
ste...@semeiosis.org wrote
As my last posting for this week:
reacting to James' fine summary --
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es wrote:
-snip-
A second, smaller camp of historians of science where I have pitched my own
tent want to know what caused modern science. They
It seems obvious to me that any property held by a very complex entity
(e.g., human being), IF it can be modeled, then that model can be used to
generalize that property ANYWHERE we wish to. On these grounds I have been
busy working on 'physiosemiosis' using the triadic formulation of semiosis
of
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
gordana.dodig-crnko...@mdh.se wrote:
Dear Stan,
Ø The key is whether the trait involved can be modeled; on these grounds it
has not yet been shown that 'qualia' can be generalized beyond the human
experience, yet even a child can see,
Replying to Gavin -- I think you make the 'error of misplaced concreteness'.
Information theory -- and all theories and laws are modeling tools, not
actual phenomena. So, it is also true that when an apple falls it is not
being pulled by gravitation. Gravitation is our way of understanding the
I am having problems communicating with lists, So I am trying to see if this
gets through.
STAN
___
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
Michel -- Organic chemistry was known to be the most difficult course in
Columbia University. But I got interested in it, worked very hard
constantly, and I achieved an 'A'. But what you say here indicates several
orders of magnitude more difficulty than what I played with in university.
For
Michel -- Regarding:
Now, I ask you the following: please can you provide an extremely
simple example (the most simple you could imagine) of situation in
which you can say: in this situation, information is ... .
Chemical information is welcome, but an example from physics would be
great, too.
by this math?
STAN
Cheers,
Joseph
- Original Message -
*From:* Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
*To:* joe.bren...@bluewin.ch ; fis@listas.unizar.es
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:16 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Fis] Category Theory and Information. Back to Basics
Joseph --
SS
Regarding:
Information Science is a perfect tool for integration of curriculum,
especially in the context of Liberal Arts education. Which other concept,
if not information, can be applied in all possible contexts of education?
I would point out that there have been two previous disciplines that
And it could feature in 'Science for Non-Majors' courses as well.
STAN
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Guy A Hoelzer hoel...@unr.edu wrote:
Hi All,
I agree with those who are suggesting that Information Science makes sense
as a widely useful way to think about different scientific
Concerning the meaning (or effect) of information (or constraint) in
general, I have proposed that context is crucial in modulating the effect
-- in all cases. Thus: it would be like the logical example:
Effect = context a x Constraint ^context b
STAN
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:18 PM,
Pedro -- it is of interest to me that
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es wrote:
Dear FISers,
Continuing with the comments on the how versus the what, it is an
important topic in mammalian (vertebrate) nervous systems. They are
Pedro -- The Aristotelian causal categories are conceptual tools, providing
language for distinguishing aspects of a scene. Without them we are liable
to miss certain aspects of nature. For example, Francis Bacon eliminated
final cause from science discourse, explicitly stating that finality can
Bruno said --
but this does not mean that Mechanism is
a good *explanation* of anything. On the contrary, I prefer to look at
it as a tool, perhaps a simplifying tool, to *formulate* the problems
(notably the mind-body problem), to explain it is not yet solved, even
in that simplifying frame,
Gordana has said:
Information and Energy/Matter
What can we hope for from studies of information related to energy/matter
(as it appears for us in space/time)? Information is a concept known for
its ambiguity in both common, everyday use and in its specific technical
applications throughout
-- Forwarded message --
From: Malcolm Dean malcolmd...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:14 PM
Subject: Fwd: It's (Almost) Alive! Scientists Create a Near-Living Crystal
| Wired Science | Wired.com
To: Stanley N. Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
-- Forwarded message
Søren -- Your science without philosophy is what we have mostly been
having since the industrial revolution. In this period sciences has mostly
been the handmaid of engineering and technology, following Francis Bacon's
recommendation. Now that our culture has captured and partly destroyed
much
Krassimir -- you said:
Social organization is a separate level of living matter hierarchy with
specific “emerged” [Ashby] features.
There is no direct “smooth” transition from one level of living matter to
another.
What is common for all levels of living matter organization are the
“information
Kark, all -- I have question about this numbers -- words concept. For
users of a given language much an be communicated by connotation as well as
denotation. It seems to me that the matching of numbers to words would not
encompass this -- would it? As well, what about synonyms with slightly
Loet -- You wrote:
This is the case for natural systems and engineered systems (Herbert
Simon). However, above the individual the hierarchy is inverted because
collectively the communication is faster than the individual can
reflexively follow.
S: In general, while smaller scale systems can
As my last posting for the week ...
Loet, Gordana --
Loet Leydesdorff
3:21 AM (6 hours ago)
to *Инга*, me, fis
S: (Nothing can go against the 'entropy law'.) A nice example for you
might be communication over distances by flashing lights using the Morse
code. The actual local operations
as a circular motion (bottom-up--top-down—
and-back-again)?
Just a thought.
All the best,
Gordana
http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/~gdc/
From: Loet Leydesdorff l...@leydesdorff.net
Date: Saturday, November 2, 2013 8:21 AM
To: 'Stanley N Salthe' ssal...@binghamton.edu, 'fis'
fis@listas.unizar.es
Here I advance a viewpoint for Hans. There has been an ongoing critique of
the very scientific viewpoint that you eschew -- namely the notion that
there is an objective world out there that we might discover. This attack
on science as it has been is known as social constructivism, and it is
In my last posting for the week, I Reply to Hans --
QBism does not change any of the impressive successes of quantum mechanics.
It simply says that quantum mechanics is a very complex, abstract encoding
of the experiences of generations of scientists interacting with atomic
systems.
S: These
Replying to Loet and Joseph:
Loet: I am not sure that you mean this with actuality. (which seems an
Aristotelian notion to me).
S: I have been using 'Actuality' (and 'Reality') as proposed by:
Roth G, Schwegler H (1990) Self-organization, emergent properties and the
study of the world. In
With hierarchy theory serving as a dressmaker's dummy, these statements:
From Guy:
*I think of collective intelligence as synonymous with collective
information processing*. I would not test for its existence by asking if
group-level action is smart or adaptive, nor do I think it is relevant to
Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
9:32 AM (0 minutes ago)
to Joseph
Joseph -- Commenting on:
We may agree that, if they are not identical, energy and information
always accompany one another and may have emerged together from some as yet
incompletely defined substrate. However, they may
, but the concept of information (its history) tends to imply
interaction.
STAN
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Robert E. Ulanowicz u...@umces.edu wrote:
Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
9:32 AM (0 minutes ago)
to Joseph
Joseph -- Commenting on:
...
Is there not also a sense
Bob wrote:
Recall that some thermodynamic variables, especially work functions like
Helmholz Gibbs free energies and exergy all are tightly related to
information measures. In statistical mechanical analogs, for example, the
exergy becomes RT times the mutual information among the molecules
S:
Bob -- I think the viewpoint on information being expressed by Gerhard is
that which sees information to be embodied in configuration/conformation.
If a configured entity is in the world it necessarily will encounter other
configurations/conformations which will result in an 'interpretation' by
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pedro C. Marijuan pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Date: Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Beginnings and ends---Steps to a theory of reference
significance
To: Stanley N Salthe ssal...@binghamton.edu
Good comment! But not only to me, it has
Terry -- Replying
T: Stan: Abiotic dissipative structures will degrade their gradients as
fast as possible given the bearing constraints. They are unconditional
maximizers. Life that has survived has been able to apply conditions upon
its entropy production, but that does not mean that it has
TD: Autogenesis is also not a Maximum Entropy Production process because it
halts dissipation before its essential self-preserving constraints are
degraded and therefore does not exhaust the gradient(s) on which its
persistence depends.
S: Abiotic dissipative structures will degrade their
Stanley N Salthe wrote:
Pedro -- Here are my reactions :
Intelligence Science is a new science. It is the scientific spirit applied
to thought and mental processes and phenomena; it is an emergent
multidisciplinary direction of research. At the same time, it represents a
long-standing
://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en
*From:* Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] *On Behalf Of *Stanley
N Salthe
*Sent:* Sunday, June 14, 2015 3:14 PM
*To:* fis
*Subject:* Re: [Fis] Philosophy, Computing, and Information - apologies!
Krassimir -- Thanks. Now I see what your
Pedro -- Your list:
physical, biological, social, and Informational
is implicitly a hierarchy -- in fact, a subsumptive hierarchy, with the
physical subsuming the biological and the biological subsuming the social.
But where should information appear? Following Wheeler, we should have:
Bob-- As one who has strayed from the Darwinian discipline of evolutionary
biology (my erstwhile field), I can say that I have 'paid the price'. But I
have had a wonderful time exploring wherever my thinking has gone. I think
the discipline has in a sense guided me anyway, as turning away from it
Terry, list --
Terry wrote:
We should not expect such a quip to be a sufficient explanation of
information in all its complexity. It is merely a useful mnemonic (coined
also by MacKay as a distinction that makes a difference) that captures
both Shannon's logic and Bateson's cybernetic
Marcus wrote:
– I find myself thinking Five Momenta must represent five types of
localities. I ask if that “smells right” to you. If so, I would think that
“localizing hierarchies” would also be needed. For example, I see: 1)
passive descriptions of Nature (aka natural philosophy, general
Pedro wrote:
I see but five different and interrelated "momenta" that should be aligned
for the hypothetical advancement of the common info field. The first one
corresponds to philosophy, as the critical playground where dissatisfaction
with the existing views should conduce to attempting more
Pedro wrote:
Unfortunately, the neglect of the life cycle is almost universal. Neither
neuroscientists nor psychologists nor social scientists are sufficiently
aware of this invisible "water" that permeates all living stuff. Echoing
some old evolutionary statement, everything should made sense
Pedro wrote"
>Most attempts to enlarge informational thought and to extend it to life,
economies, societies, etc. continue to be but a reformulation of the former
ideas with little added value.
S: Well, I have generalized the Shannon concept of information carrying
capacity under 'variety'...
Loet wrote:
I suggest to distinguish between three levels (following Weaver): A.
(Shannon-type) information processing ; B. meaning sharing using languages;
C. translations among coded communications.
So, here we have a subsumptive hierarchy"
{reduction of possibilities {interpretation
Loet -- A metabiolgy does not imply that there would not be
more-than-biological properties and processes going on. We would not
bother to identify a higher level unless it had some of its own emergent
properties.
STAN
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Loet Leydesdorff
Nikhil -- Leaving aside details of hierarchical structure, I point out,
concerning economics:
It seems that you have in mind a global economic system in your planning.
Is that so? I think that the current global capitalist system would need to
be eschewed.
Then, this also would seem to involve
Regarding your last posting, I agree, and would formulate the following
subsumption hierarchy:
(thermodynamic energy flows {Shannon information theory {Peircean
semiotics}}}
STAN
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Is this a question
Entropy
Regarding:
> So I see it that you confirm to Shannon´s interpretation of entropy as
actually being information <
Well, in essence we may agree, but I would call this an unfortunate choice
of words. “Information," I think, has come to mean so many things to so
many people that it is
Bruno, Joseph -- The unity of the sciences comes from the fact that one
understands sociality by way of biology, and one understands biology by way
of chemistry, and then one understands chemistry by way of physics. Thus,
the subsumptive hierarchy:
{physics {chemistry {biology {sociality
Marcus -- You have an interesting point regarding plants and
phenomenology. Their behavior occurs over a time scale where we
phenomenologists see nothing happening. This slow time scale was
illuminated by non-phenomenological science studies, while also inquiring
into faster-than-phenomenological
RE: The organization of bodies of knowledge in the sciences takes place at
another level than the integration of cognition in the body of an
individual. One cannot reduce the one level to the other, in my opinion.
Which research program of these two has priority? How do they relate ?
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo