;mailto:l...@leydesdorff.net>;
>>> http://www.leydesdorff.net/
>>> Honorary Professor, SPRU, <http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/>University of
>>> Sussex;
>>>
>>> Guest Professor Zhejiang Univ. <http://www.zju.edu.cn/english/>,
>>> Hangzh
rief_en.html>Beijing;
>>
>> Visiting Professor, Birkbeck <http://www.bbk.ac.uk/>, University of
>> London;
>>
>> http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en <
>> http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en>
>>
>
user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en
<http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en>
*From:* Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es
<mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es>] *On Behalf Of *Steven
Ericsson-Zenith
*Sent:* Monday, December 08, 201
'Steven Ericsson-Zenith' ; 'fis'
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Information-as-Process
Dear Steven and colleagues,
I did not (yet) study your approach. Is there a paper that can be read as an
introduction?
It seems to me that one
l.com [mailto:stevenzen...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 10:13 PM
To: l...@leydesdorff.net
Cc: Joseph Brenner; fis
Subject: Re: [Fis] Information-as-Process
The problem with this approach (and approaches like it) is that it is
descriptive and not
>, University of
> London;
>
> http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en
>
>
>
> *From:* Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] *On Behalf Of *Steven
> Ericsson-Zenith
> *Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2014 10:22 PM
> *To:* Joseph Brenner
9gNYJ&hl=en
From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Steven
Ericsson-Zenith
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 10:22 PM
To: Joseph Brenner
Cc: fis
Subject: Re: [Fis] Information-as-Process
I am a little mystified by your assertion of "information as proce
I am a little mystified by your assertion of "information as process."
What, exactly, is this and how does it differ fro information in general
(Shannon). Is it related to Whitehead's process notions?
In terms of neuroscience it is important to move away from connectionism
and modern computational
Dear Carolina, Bob L., Bob U., Sören and Krassimir,
First of all thanks to Carolina for having launched a most interesting
thread, of which I have changed the title since the issues are broader than
that of Neuroinformation alone, as Francesco has noted.
My first point is a response to Sören
