=en
*From:* Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] *On Behalf Of *Pedro C.
Marijuan
*Sent:* Friday, April 24, 2015 2:34 PM
*To:* Terrence W. DEACON; 'fis'
*Subject:* Re: [Fis] New Year Lecture: Aftermath
Dear Terry and colleagues,
I hope you don't mind if I send some suggestions
Hi Terry,
I have used the term ‘perception’ in referring to in-formation that affects
internal structure or dynamics. This would contrast with forms of potential
information that might pass through the system without being ‘perceived’. For
example, we have a finite number of mechanisms we
complexity and
commitment.
Cheers,
Joseph
Message d'origine
De : dea...@berkeley.edu
Date : 24/04/2015 - 10:22 (PST)
À : pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Cc : fis@listas.unizar.es
Objet : Re: [Fis] New Year Lecture: Aftermath
Hi Pedro,
Indeed, you capture a fundamental point of my work. I entirely
Hi Pedro,
Indeed, you capture a fundamental point of my work. I entirely agree with
your comment about living processes and their internal informative
organization. The three exceedingly simple molecular model systems (forms
of autogenesis) that I discuss toward the end of the paper were intended
Hi Guy,
Yes. At the very basic level that I explore with these ultra simple model
systems it would not be easy to distinguish perception and reaction. Both
involve interpretive steps, in that only some material
features—specifically those with potentially disruptive or constructive
potential for
Dear FIS colleagues,
Herewith the comments received from Terry several weeks ago. As I said
yesterday, the idea is to properly conclude that session, not to restart
the discussion. Of course, scholarly comments are always welcome, but
conclusively and not looking for argumentative rounds.
