ty of KwaZulu-Natal
>
> http://web.ncf.ca/collier
>
>
>
> *From:* Guy A Hoelzer [mailto:hoel...@unr.edu]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 29 March 2017 1:44 AM
> *To:* Sungchul Ji <s...@pharmacy.rutgers.edu>; Terry Deacon <
> dea...@berkeley.edu>; John Collier <colli...@ukzn.
: Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:00 AM
To: Terrence W. DEACON <dea...@berkeley.edu>
Cc: fis <fis@listas.unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [Fis] Causation is transfer of information
With all due respect, I am still amazed how it is so much ignored and neglected
all the science and math around informati
John Collier
Cc: fis
Subject: RE: [Fis] Causation is transfer of information
Dear Sung
It is difficult for me to say as you do not make your metaphysical framework
explicit. This was the great work Peirce did. I am pretty sure you do not have
a dynamic triadic process concept of se
sbr@cbs.dk>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:10 PM
To: Sungchul Ji; Terrence W. DEACON; John Collier
Cc: fis
Subject: RE: [Fis] Causation is transfer of information
Dear Sung
I suggest you call this your own theory and make your own definitions of terms,
because you confuse
With all due respect, I am still amazed how it is so much ignored and
neglected all the science and math around information developed in the last
50-60 years! With most people here citing in the best case only Shannon
Entropy but completely neglecting and ignoring algorithmic complexity,
logical
In order:
John,
I agree. For example, if one identifies information with constraint, the
notion of information as causation becomes tautologous. It also feeds into
the notion of "It from bit"!
Terry,
I agree, best to remain as catholic as possible in our conception of the
notion.
Otto:
