Re: [Fis] Everett & quantum wave collapse

2018-05-21 Thread Bruno Marchal
Dear Arthuro, > On 17 May 2018, at 16:30, tozziart...@libero.it wrote: > > Dear Bruno, > > as far as you wrote and I understood, your Mechanistic framework requires the > tenet that quantum wave collapse does not exist. > > In order to prove that, you invoke the authority of Everett. > >

Re: [Fis] Everett & quantum wave collapse

2018-05-17 Thread Lars-Göran Johansson
I completely agree, Arturo! And Everett’s many world’s interpretation have been criticised, I would say, killed, since long, for example by Healy and Stein, both in NOUS XVIII, 1984. The problem is conceptual; what does Everett mean by a world? Referring to your simple example below, one might