Pedro,
re: Do we need a new interpretation of history, info based?
hb: we definitely need a few new tools with which to see the patterns of
history. whether those patterns are informational or not, I'm not sure. I
lean toward the tools you cite, the ones emerging from biology.
to all (and particularly thanks to Hans for his hyper-kind comment!)
--Pedro
De: howlbl...@aol.com [howlbl...@aol.com]
Enviado el: miércoles, 06 de enero de 2016 0:37
Para: PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ; fis@listas.unizar.es
Asunto: Re: [Fis] January Lecture--Inform
Dear Howard and Pedro,
Please allow me to comment on the complementary visions of the Lucifer vs.
the "angelic" scenarios.
Anyone familiar with my work knows that I see configurations of mutually
beneficial processes as the driver behind all of evolution. The problem is
that this dynamic is,
Dear Howard and Colleagues,
Many thanks for your contribution! This is the third time we have a New Year
Lecture, and the first one devoted to humanities. Well, to the "inhumanities"
should I say, as what you have depicted succinctly with the Lucifer Principle
describes the main evil that has
good commentary, pedro.
where do compassion and love--the archangel principle--fit into the
lucifer principle? and why have groups progressed in complexity since the end
of the last ice age eleven thousand years ago?
to form a superorganism, a cohesive group, you need huge amounts of
