Dear FIS colleagues,
First of all, let me welcome Sonu Bhaskar, and also John Onian, it is a
pleasure reading their exciting contributions to the list.
About the 10 universal laws of art by Ramachandran, well, reading the
web reference kindly included by Sonu, one can see that the terms are
Dear Lauri,
You wrote:
Laws should be independent of each other.
Why? Who says so?
Cheers,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Lauri Gröhn
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Neuroscience of art
Hi all,
I am
Prof. Grohn, List:
I am curious about what you are seeking to communicate when you write:
I am afraid that list can't be validated as a set laws. Laws
should be independent of each other.
What is the rational for your feelings about law (singular) vs laws
(plural)?
Is it necessary
Lauri -- Well, let's see:
(1) First Law of thermodynamics: The total
energy of a thermodynamically isolated system
remains unchanged.
(2) Second Law of thermodynamics: If there are
any energy gradients in a system, they undergo
transformations from one form to another, with
some of it
At 05:30 PM 2008/09/18, Sonu Bhaskar wrote:
Dear FIS Colleagues,
The cognizance between the art and cognitive neuroscience has been
relatively ignored in the scientific fraternity. The recent proposition
regarding the ten laws of art, as Dr. V. S. Ramachandran puts it,
has ignited a new debate
