Re: [Fis] WG: stuff and non-stuff

2012-02-29 Thread Bruno Marchal

Hi Joe, and FIS colleagues,

On 28 Feb 2012, at 19:16, joe.bren...@bluewin.ch wrote:


Dear Pedro, John and Colleagues,

The article by Terrence Deacon in the book referred to by John is  
entitled What is Missing from Theories of Information? and, as  
Pedro has indicated, it and Deacon's new book Incomplete Nature. How  
Mind Emerged from Matter may be major new additions to the  
foundations of information. Among other things, far from supporting  
it from bit, Deacon provides expert arguments against this  
position, adopted indeed in a majority of the other articles in the  
Davies compendium.


Deacon's key point is that what is missing from theories is  
operation in reality of constraints, extending their role discussed  
previously by Stuart Kauffmann, Bob Logan, Bob Ulanowicz, Stan and  
John himself and focussing on what, as the consequence of  
constraints, is absent in information and other complex processes.


I hope that many colleagues will make the effort to access this  
material so that we may achieve a critical mass for its discussion  
and evaluation.


If ontologically-primitive matter is assumed, and if mind emerges from  
it, then something non turing emulable needs to be assume in the  
working of the brain+environment. I can argue in all detail. If we  
assume that there is a level of substitution of the generalized  
brain (the portion of the universe needed for may consciousness),  
such that we can function with our usual private subjective life  
intact, then we cannot escape the it from bit and physicalism is not  
defensible. Indeed physics, in that theoretical frame has to be  
retrieved from arithmetic, or from any first order logical  
specification of any universal (in Turing Church sense) system.


If computationalism is assumed we have, with = being close to a  
logical implication:


Numbers = consciousness = physicalness = Human-type of Consciousness.

Such reduction does give a key role to information processing and  
computation in the 'big picture'. I am not sure something is missing  
in the theories of information, once they take into account  
(theoretical) computer science.


Best,

Bruno









Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Datum: 21.02.2012 18:02
An:
Betreff: [Fis] stuff and non-stuff

Dear FIS colleagues,

John's comments below on that book are quite interesting. Most  
approaches to information rely on stuff and organization of  
stuff --information is inevitably physical, as Rolf Landauer put  
long ago. However, non stuff and organization of non stuff  
might be taken as central ideas too, e.g. in Deacon's approach -- 
through the notion of absence. Deacon is one of the main  
contributors of that book, and author of another very recent info  
book that has already been referred in this list, by Joseph I think.


My further point, to connect with an unfinished message on info  
science teaching some weeks ago, is that genuine informational  
entities, those capable of making distinctions that are used for  
self-constructing in permanent communication with the medium,  
deserve a special status within the whole info science studies.  
These distinctional entities are but the great players of the  
absence game... Therfor info science teaching should cover central  
themes, multidisciplinary recombinations, and the comparative  
study of informational-distinctional entities.


Best wishes to all!

---Pedro
John Collier escribió:


Hi all,
I am reviewing a book edited by Paul Davies and Niels Henrik  
Gregersen titled Information and the Nature of Reality: From  
Physics to Metaphysics. There is a lot of quasireligious stuff that  
I find hard to swallow, mostly by people I have never heard of  
before, but many of the chapters are by well-known scholars who  
have been influential in physics and biology, as well as the  
history of science. The most common thread through the articles is  
that the world is not made up of stuff (matter), and that the  
idea has been problematic since its introduction. Instead the world  
is made of information (the It from Bit view). Interesting book,  
even if you don't agree with it.

John

Professor John Collier
Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal
Durban 4041 South Africa
T: +27 (31) 260 3248 / 260 2292
F: +27 (31) 260 3031
email: colli...@ukzn.ac.za On 2012/01/23 at 07:18 PM, in message  
4f1d967a.8070...@aragon.es, 


--
-
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Avda. Gómez Laguna, 25, Pl. 11ª
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Telf: 34 976 71 3526 ( 6818) Fax: 34 976 71 5554
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
-




___
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



Re: [Fis] WG: stuff and non-stuff

2012-02-28 Thread Bob Logan
Dear Joe - thanks for the honourable mention - I am in fact working my way thru 
Terry's masterpiece (on p. 200) and agree with your evaluation of it. I am 
making careful notes which I will be happy to share with the FIS team. Best 
wishes to all - Bob

 
On 2012-02-28, at 1:16 PM, joe.bren...@bluewin.ch wrote:

 Dear Pedro, John and Colleagues,
 
 The article by Terrence Deacon in the book referred to by John is entitled 
 What is Missing from Theories of Information? and, as Pedro has indicated, 
 it and Deacon's new book Incomplete Nature. How Mind Emerged from Matter may 
 be major new additions to the foundations of information. Among other things, 
 far from supporting it from bit, Deacon provides expert arguments against 
 this position, adopted indeed in a majority of the other articles in the 
 Davies compendium.
 
 Deacon's key point is that what is missing from theories is operation in 
 reality of constraints, extending their role discussed previously by Stuart 
 Kauffmann, Bob Logan, Bob Ulanowicz, Stan and John himself and focussing on 
 what, as the consequence of constraints, is absent in information and other 
 complex processes.
 
 I hope that many colleagues will make the effort to access this material so 
 that we may achieve a critical mass for its discussion and evaluation.
 
 Best wishes,
 
 
 Ursprüngliche Nachricht
 Von: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
 Datum: 21.02.2012 18:02
 An: 
 Betreff: [Fis] stuff and non-stuff
 
 Dear FIS colleagues,
 
 John's comments below on that book are quite interesting. Most approaches to 
 information rely on stuff and organization of stuff --information is 
 inevitably physical, as Rolf Landauer put long ago. However, non stuff and 
 organization of non stuff might be taken as central ideas too, e.g. in 
 Deacon's approach --through the notion of absence. Deacon is one of the main 
 contributors of that book, and author of another very recent info book that 
 has already been referred in this list, by Joseph I think.
 
 My further point, to connect with an unfinished message on info science 
 teaching some weeks ago, is that genuine informational entities, those 
 capable of making distinctions that are used for self-constructing in 
 permanent communication with the medium, deserve a special status within the 
 whole info science studies. These distinctional entities are but the great 
 players of the absence game... Therfor info science teaching should cover 
 central themes, multidisciplinary recombinations, and the comparative 
 study of informational-distinctional entities.
 
 Best wishes to all!
 
 ---Pedro
 John Collier escribió:
 
 Hi all,
 I am reviewing a book edited by Paul Davies and Niels Henrik Gregersen 
 titled Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics. 
 There is a lot of quasireligious stuff that I find hard to swallow, mostly 
 by people I have never heard of before, but many of the chapters are by 
 well-known scholars who have been influential in physics and biology, as 
 well as the history of science. The most common thread through the articles 
 is that the world is not made up of stuff (matter), and that the idea has 
 been problematic since its introduction. Instead the world is made of 
 information (the It from Bit view). Interesting book, even if you don't 
 agree with it.
 John
 
 Professor John Collier  
 Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal
 Durban 4041 South Africa
 T: +27 (31) 260 3248 / 260 2292
 F: +27 (31) 260 3031
 email: colli...@ukzn.ac.za On 2012/01/23 at 07:18 PM, in message 
 4f1d967a.8070...@aragon.es, 
 
 --
 -
 Pedro C. Marijuán
 Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
 Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
 Avda. Gómez Laguna, 25, Pl. 11ª
 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
 Telf: 34 976 71 3526 ( 6818) Fax: 34 976 71 5554
 pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
 http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
 -
 
 
 
 
 ___
 fis mailing list
 fis@listas.unizar.es
 https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

__

Robert K. Logan
Chief Scientist - sLab at OCAD
Prof. Emeritus - Physics - U. of Toronto 
www.physics.utoronto.ca/Members/logan




___
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis