Re: [Fis] there is no need to number every word

2018-02-18 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi Alex, > On 16 Feb 2018, at 06:18, Alex Hankey wrote: > > But Bruno, to harp on an old point, > "mathematicians (and their “dreams”)" > implies the world of 'ideas’, Yes. You can identify the ideas with the program, and thus with the numbers once you fix some base

Re: [Fis] there is no need to number every word

2018-02-16 Thread Louis Kauffman
Dear Alex, To add my 2 cents: Please note that it is your theory that the world of ideas is described by “catastrophes” and it is Bruno’s theory that the world of ideas is described by the full Goedelian encoding of formal systems. In Bruno’s theory the world of ideas are in ‘arithmetic’ in

Re: [Fis] there is no need to number every word

2018-02-15 Thread Alex Hankey
But Bruno, to harp on an old point, "mathematicians (and their “dreams”)" implies the world of 'ideas', and as I have said, those are not in the world of 'arithmetic', in the sense that they are *not* described by digital information, but by catastrophes. On 15 February 2018 at 15:14, Bruno

Re: [Fis] there is no need to number every word

2018-02-15 Thread Bruno Marchal
> On 13 Feb 2018, at 04:46, mihir chakraborty wrote: > > Dear Friends, > > i did not enter the site --- but was not such numbering already done > by great Goedel ? The so called Goedel numbering ? Yes, good point. And that made possible the arithmetization of

Re: [Fis] there is no need to number every word

2018-02-12 Thread mihir chakraborty
Dear Friends, i did not enter the site --- but was not such numbering already done by great Goedel ? The so called Goedel numbering ? mihir On 2/11/18, Krassimir Markov wrote: > Dear Karl and FIS colleagues, > Yes, the Number Theory is very important basis! > But, I think,