Re: [Fish-users] Fwd: delays in showing prompt

2010-05-05 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Ben Hoskings wrote: > That's odd. Can you double check the version you're using is built from my > fork? I'm pretty confident it fixes the problem. > Try this: > echo test ^/dev/null > If that prints "test ^/dev/null", you're running my fork. > If it prints "test",

Re: [Fish-users] Fwd: delays in showing prompt

2010-05-05 Thread i...@whywouldwe.com
pe...@morpheus[~]$ echo test ^/dev/null test ^/dev/null pe...@morpheus[~]$ Looks like I am running your fork. This was the reason why I switched to your fork (last week some time), after I switched I recall being disappointed as it was still happening but I've tried running ~10 commands just n

[Fish-users] Fwd: delays in showing prompt

2010-05-05 Thread Ben Hoskings
On 6 May 2010 14:05, i...@whywouldwe.com wrote: > I get that as well and find it very annoying. I got it with the normal > version so currently I'm using Ben Hoskins OS X version > (http://github.com/benhoskings/fish), but I also happens for me with > that (on OS X 10.6.3). No idea why it happens

Re: [Fish-users] delays in showing prompt

2010-05-05 Thread i...@whywouldwe.com
I get that as well and find it very annoying. I got it with the normal version so currently I'm using Ben Hoskins OS X version (http://github.com/benhoskings/fish), but I also happens for me with that (on OS X 10.6.3). No idea why it happens. Ronny Haryanto wrote: > Hi, it's me again. I have a

[Fish-users] delays in showing prompt

2010-05-05 Thread Ronny Haryanto
Hi, it's me again. I have another issue that I thought should be in a separate thread. Sometimes there's about 5-10 seconds delay before the prompt shows up, either when opening new tab in iTerm or just when the previous command finishes, or even just pressing enter repeatedly. It's rather annoyin

Re: [Fish-users] setting PATH

2010-05-05 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Martin Bähr wrote: > one issue i remember was that all the variables fish inherits from > its environment are not universal variables, but global i think. so > whenever you start fish, you will always have a global PATH variable > unless you delete that. > > do you

Re: [Fish-users] setting PATH

2010-05-05 Thread Martin Bähr
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:40:08AM +1000, Ronny Haryanto wrote: > Thanks for your help. I've tried restarting, moving .config/fish to > .config/fish-backup, still no good. It keeps reverting to the old > PATH. I'm really lost. > > I was able to set and export other universal array variables just >

Re: [Fish-users] setting PATH

2010-05-05 Thread Ronny Haryanto
Thanks for your help. I've tried restarting, moving .config/fish to .config/fish-backup, still no good. It keeps reverting to the old PATH. I'm really lost. I was able to set and export other universal array variables just fine. It's just PATH that seems to be a special case. ro...@iron ~> set -U

Re: [Fish-users] setting PATH

2010-05-05 Thread Ronny Haryanto
Hi, Thanks for your response. I didn't know that you can have variables with the same name in different context. I checked, and it turned out that PATH exists in both global and universal scopes. So I deleted the global one with set -ge PATH, and then did a set -x PATH ... again. Now when I do ec

Re: [Fish-users] setting PATH

2010-05-05 Thread i...@whywouldwe.com
Hi Ronny There are 3 different variable contexts, local, global and universal. When setting a variable that already exists you don't need to specify the context as it will use the context for the existing variable. Although what you're doing seems correct I suspect you're creating an addition