Re: [Fish-users] dependencies of fish?

2014-03-09 Thread David Adam
On Sun, 9 Mar 2014, SanskritFritz wrote: > Could you please have a look here: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39236#comment120328 > "fish explicitly links to ncurses and gcc-libs (see readelf -d output) > and as shown by FS#35458 , it also needs hostname from inetutils > package." I've edited t

Re: [Fish-users] dependencies of fish?

2014-03-09 Thread SanskritFritz
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 6:02 PM, SanskritFritz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:16 PM, David Adam wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, SanskritFritz wrote: >> >>> For packaging purposes, I'd like to receive an official statement >>> about fish' hard dependencies. So far I know about bc and ncurses. Is >

Re: [Fish-users] dependencies of fish?

2014-03-09 Thread SanskritFritz
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:16 PM, David Adam wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, SanskritFritz wrote: > >> For packaging purposes, I'd like to receive an official statement >> about fish' hard dependencies. So far I know about bc and ncurses. Is >> that correct? > > Yes. Plus, the usual tools that most Uni

Re: [Fish-users] dependencies of fish?

2014-03-09 Thread David Adam
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, SanskritFritz wrote: > For packaging purposes, I'd like to receive an official statement > about fish' hard dependencies. So far I know about bc and ncurses. Is > that correct? Yes. Plus, the usual tools that most Unix-like systems have. > I haven't found anything in the docu