Re: [Fish-users] Adding functions to share/functions: acceptability?

Le vendredi 08 décembre 2017 à 21:57 +, Michael Stillwell a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:41 PM, David Adam > wrote: > > > >    3. which directory should I place such functions in, on an > > > installed > > >   fish instance, to test them?

Re: [Fish-users] Adding functions to share/functions: acceptability?

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:41 PM, David Adam wrote: >>3. which directory should I place such functions in, on an installed >> fish instance, to test them? ~/.config/fish/functions? > > That's the easiest way! You've probably discovered this, but sometimes fish

Re: [Fish-users] Adding functions to share/functions: acceptability?

Hi David, On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, David Guyot wrote: > I'm working on completions for zfs and zpool commands, but there are > some shared functions between them, for instance for zpool completions > accepting zfs properties. On one hand, I'm reluctant to duplicate code, > as it is likely that, when a