Re: [flac-dev] warning that legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample is 24

2017-05-27 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Brian Willoughby wrote: > Are there some (old) programs that will not accept WAVEX headers? I'm > trying to think of why the flac utility worked this way in the first place. Yes probably. But that was probably 10 years ago or more. > In any event, it seems like it would be prudent to add a comma

Re: [flac-dev] warning that legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample is 24

2017-05-27 Thread Brian Willoughby
On May 26, 2017, at 9:52 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Mark H. David wrote: >> Notice the warning was given only for the WAVE file produced by the >> flac reference executable. > > I agree. The flac decoder should not generate WAV files which it > warns about when encoding. > >> Should I fi

Re: [flac-dev] warning that legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample is 24

2017-05-27 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > Notice the warning was given only for the WAVE file produced by the > > flac reference executable. > > I agree. The flac decoder should not generate WAV files which it > warns about when encoding. Fixed in Git. Thanks, Erik -- ---