On Aug 9, 2009, at 21:18, Didier Dambrin wrote:
>>> ..But sadly none of FLAC, WavPack or OptimFrog could compress the
>>> pre-processed song better, or hardly. And considering you'd also
>>> have to add
>>> the pool of frames, it would end up worse.
>>
>> This surprises me. Have you tried alignin
>> ..But sadly none of FLAC, WavPack or OptimFrog could compress the
>> pre-processed song better, or hardly. And considering you'd also
>> have to add
>> the pool of frames, it would end up worse.
>
> This surprises me. Have you tried aligning your frames to the
> standard FLAC frame size?
>
No
On Aug 8, 2009, at 23:11, Didier Dambrin wrote:
> Electronic music quite often doesn't leave a computer these days.
> And it
> mainly consists of drums, synths & vocals/effects. Drums are often
> samples
> sequenced at sample (not sub-sample) accuracy, thus repeated (of
> course if
> the son
I'm doing testing on this at the moment.
But to start with:
>>Because music represents an analog signal,
As I wrote, it would only apply to specific genres, not analog recordings.
Electronic music quite often doesn't leave a computer these days. And it
mainly consists of drums, synths & vocals/
