-- Boris Shingarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yes, and much more so in the encoder. the decoder is already
> > very fast and approaching a fundamental limit.
> >
> > the next release of FLAC will be slightly faster encoding and
> > decoding.
>
> Well, I hope to have a proof-of-concept FLAC-o
> yes, and much more so in the encoder. the decoder is already
> very fast and approaching a fundamental limit.
>
> the next release of FLAC will be slightly faster encoding and
> decoding.
Well, I hope to have a proof-of-concept FLAC-on-CUDA to run on the
latest generation of NVidia cards, some
--- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/5/14, Josh Coalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > if you look at the comparison here:
> > http://flac.sourceforge.net/comparison.html
> > you will see that FLAC is already within 3-4% of the most aggresive
> > codecs.
>
> so in the future we can expect
2007/5/14, Josh Coalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
>
> i was wondering if it's possible to tell me what the theoretical best
> compression ratio the flac encoder can do, because i was wondering
> what the future of flac will bring us. So this question is
--- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
>
> i was wondering if it's possible to tell me what the theoretical best
> compression ratio the flac encoder can do, because i was wondering
> what the future of flac will bring us. So this question is probably
> best addressed to Josh: can we suspe
hi
i was wondering if it's possible to tell me what the theoretical best
compression ratio the flac encoder can do, because i was wondering
what the future of flac will bring us. So this question is probably
best addressed to Josh: can we suspect much better compression ratio
in the future or is
