lvqcl wrote:
About a commit
http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commitdiff;h=40e817dc526d1d41e900bb0f54d1a4451bda01ed
I think it's more consistent to write
FLAC__int16 s16buffer[FLAC__MAX_BLOCK_SIZE * FLAC__MAX_CHANNELS *
sizeof(FLAC__int32)/sizeof(FLAC__int16)];
instead of
Martijn van Beurden wrote:
op 29-06-14 15:31, Erik de Castro Lopo schreef:
I would appreciate it if people could kick this around, test on other
platforms/architectures and test for performance regressions.
These patches indeed fix the -Wcast-align warnings, but the new
MD5 tests fail
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
FLAC__int16 s16buffer[FLAC__MAX_BLOCK_SIZE * FLAC__MAX_CHANNELS *
sizeof(FLAC__int32)/sizeof(FLAC__int16)];
instead of
FLAC__int16 s16buffer[FLAC__MAX_BLOCK_SIZE * FLAC__MAX_CHANNELS *
sizeof(FLAC__int16)];
Really? Would you also write this? :
FLAC__int32
lvqcl wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
It slightly improves the performance with standard encoding levels and
16-bit files as the 17-bit side channel can still be processed with the
32-bit accumulator and correctly selects the 64-bit accumulator with
very large 16-bit partitions.
This is
