sorry about the delay... this it the first I'm seeing the message,
maybe it got stuck in moderation because of the cross posting.
--- Christian HJ Wiesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I was wondering how suitable both are with respect to video editing,
> especially if it comes to sample precise cu
sorry about the delay, looks like this mail just made it through
moderation (at least today is when I got it)
--- Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> The GStreamer flac plugin broke due to libflac 1.1.0 and libflac
> 1.1.1
> not being ABI/API compatible. Skimming
Josh Coalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FLAC 1.1.2 release candidate is now available at
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.1.2-beta.tar.gz?download
Installation fails in doc/html/Makefile if doxygen is not available.
make: don't know how to make install-data-local. Stop in
Hi,
The GStreamer flac plugin broke due to libflac 1.1.0 and libflac 1.1.1
not being ABI/API compatible. Skimming through the archives I see that
this breakage was intentional. I think it is quite common understanding
that when you have a stable release of something you don't break your
API, you on
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Josh Coalson wrote:
> OK, I am going to do a 1.1.2 earlier than I wanted in order to
> fix this. anyway there are some bug fixes and speedups that will
> be of benefit.
>
> because of the mess and since there have been API changes and
> additions in both libFLAC and libOggFLA
Josh Coalson wrote:
--- Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Coalson wrote:
since I don't know how to resolve this, in current CVS I have
checked in a system where there are src/libFLAC/ppc/as and
src/libFLAC/ppc/gas selected by configure. I have also checked
in as many patches as I could
Josh Coalson wrote:
since I don't know how to resolve this, in current CVS I have
checked in a system where there are src/libFLAC/ppc/as and
src/libFLAC/ppc/gas selected by configure. I have also checked
in as many patches as I could make sense of (the cpu.c detection
stuff and the configure.in st
Bryan Levin reported a problem of the FreeBSD flac port dumping
core on FreeBSD 4.x:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1099004&group_id=13478&atid=113478
It turns out that the port enabled SSE support, but FreeBSD 4.x
does not support SSE by default. (FreeBSD 5.x and later
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote:
> As such it's an incompatible change, for which you should also
> zero the 'age' field. So 1.1.1-beta1 should have been 2:0:0,
> not 2:0:1.
[...]
> Yes, I agree. The numbering is all about coexisting installs of the
> various versions.
Ok. I need to know
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:22:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> liboggflac FROM THE 1.0.4 RELEASE has version-info 0:1:0
> liboggflac FROM THE 1.1.1 RELEASE has version-info 2:1:1
Well, the packages we are having trouble here are:
flac 1.1
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Is the debian mismatch based on a release between these too? Should
> > flac-1.1.1 release have been 2:1:0? In either case, it seems rebuilding
> > all the packages against the 1.1.1 library should resolve the issue?
Well, if something built against
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:31:47PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > liboggflac1 did not change the soname (better check this, it might
> > > require a
> > > soname change, check the seekable ogg-flac support stuff).
> >
> > CCing upstream on this. Josh
Hi,
this email is sent to flac-dev AT xiph DOT org, copied to matroska-devel
AT lists DOT matroska DOT org, and David Bryant, the author of Wavpack4.
We are about to implement the DV ( Digital Video ) video compression
standard into matroska, to be able to offer an intelligent alternative
to AV
13 matches
Mail list logo
