Re: [Flac-dev] Re: build issues

2006-11-18 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Ralph Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:32:02AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:
 
  OK, I built on one of the sourceforge machines and made a bunch
  more fixes.  there are a couple innocuous warnings but the tests
  all pass for me.  I also checked in changes to the vendor string,
  can you try one more time now?
 
 Yep, all 7 tests pass now. Yay!
 
 Attached is an autogen integration patch:
 (a) pass -I m4 to aclocal
 (b) set a minimum automake version of 1.7
 
 Both are required to build out of cvs on my Ubuntu system.

cool, checked in, thanks



 

Sponsored Link

Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. 
$510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment! 
www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] Re: build issues

2006-11-11 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Ralph Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 05:28:39PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:
 
  which tests?  for a little while there, test_seeking would fail
  because of an intermittent bug in the seek routine which has been
  fixed.  test_flac and test_metaflac are currently failing because
  of mismatches in the vendor string that I mentioned before.
 
 Ok, I updated to CVS as of this morning, and now only two of the
 tests 
 failed. I didn't really investigate, but attaching build warning and 
 'make check' output logs for the record.

ok, checked in some fixes that should take care of most of the
warnings.

  but it wouldn't surprise me if there are some 64 bit bugs still
  since I don't have a machine to build on.
 
 There are a couple in the sourceforge.net compile farm, or I can give
 you an account on mine. Just send me an ssh public key.

oh yeah, will try the SF machines.

Josh



 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


Re: [Flac-dev] Re: build issues

2006-11-11 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Ralph Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:03:12PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:
 
  ok, checked in some fixes that should take care of most of the
  warnings.
 
 Nice! Current complete set of warnings:
 
 replaygain.c: In function 'parse_double_':
 replaygain.c:612: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
 replaygain.c:612: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional
 expression
 encode.c:2686: warning: 'limit_channel_mask' defined but not used
 
 There are lots of minor differences in the 'make check' output, but
 two tests still fail.

yeah, I'm pretty sure from looking at the log that the only
problem is caused by the vendor string.  if you change it to
reference libFLAC 1.1.3 20061120 in src/libFLAC/format.c they
should all pass.

Josh



 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


[Flac-dev] Re: build issues

2006-11-08 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Ralph Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 BTW, I ran into a few issues building with recent cvs.
 
 You might want to consider copying autogen.sh from one of the other
 xiph 
 codec projects and setting a proper minimum version in
 AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS. 
 The current one just breaks if it the default automake isn't the 
 appropriate version, but debian based systems (at least) often 
 have several versions installed in parallel. We have code to pick an 
 appropriate one. It will also choose glibtoolize instead of
 libtoolize 
 on macosx, but that's not a complete solution because it doesn't have
 the iconv macros.
 
 You should also include a copy of ogg.m4 in the m4 directory,
 otherwise that check can't fail cleanly.

ok.

 Finally and most important, 4 of the 7 self tests failed on my x86_64
 system (x86_64-linux-gnu, ubuntu 6.06.1, gcc version 4.0.3) so it
 seems  there are definite 64 bit problems.

which tests?  for a little while there, test_seeking would fail
because of an intermittent bug in the seek routine which has been
fixed.  test_flac and test_metaflac are currently failing because
of mismatches in the vendor string that I mentioned before.

but it wouldn't surprise me if there are some 64 bit bugs still
since I don't have a machine to build on.

Josh




 

Sponsored Link

Get a free Motorola Razr! Today Only! 
Choose Cingular, Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, or T-Mobile. 
http://www.letstalk.com/inlink.htm?to=592913
___
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev