Re: [flac-dev] PATCH for MSVC++ 2005 Express

2013-08-19 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
lvqcl wrote: Recently I downloaded MSVC++2005 Express Edition That was the free (as in free beer) version, right? and it turns out that it wasn't possible to compile all files without several changes: Is there not a later free (as in free beer) version? If there is, it makes little sense to

Re: [flac-dev] Closing sf.net issue tracker

2013-08-19 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Ralph Giles wrote: As part of the ongoing move of FLAC's project hosting from sourceforge.net to xiph.org, we're planning to remove the issue tracker there. Erik doesn't check it, so issues filed there are just rotting, and that's a poor experience. We don't have a decent alternative at

Re: [flac-dev] PATCH for MSVC++ 2005 Express

2013-08-19 Thread lvqcl
Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote: Is there not a later free (as in free beer) version? There are also 2008, 2010 and 2012 versions. VS2012 Express requires Win7 to run (though it can create programs compatible with WinXP). VS2010 Express works on WinXP. It is possible to compile

[flac-dev] PATCH for bitmath.h, part 2

2013-08-19 Thread lvqcl
I noticed another problem, now with _BitScanReverse64: --- a\src\libFLAC\include\private\bitmath.h 2013-08-16 23:02:38.869769500 +0400 +++ b\src\libFLAC\include\private\bitmath.h 2013-08-19 18:46:37.424494400 +0400 @@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ return sizeof(FLAC__uint64) * CHAR_BIT - 1 -

[flac-dev] sf bug 258 - don't calloc pointers

2013-08-19 Thread Ralph Giles
Bug suggests using literal assignment to initialize pointers in structures instead of calloc, to avoid pointer-representation assumptions. https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/258/ Pointers should not be initialised by the function calloc if they are a member of a bigger data structure. Would