' of things to fix?
Thanks
Olav Sunde
Hi all,
Some time ago, I foolishly agreed to become the maintainer of FLAC,
the Free Lossless Audio Codec. The original author and maintainer
Josh Coalson has been MIA since early 2009.
The code has been moved to the Xiph.org git repo and I'll be trying
to spend
of -5 or higher, resulting in unstable playback or even reduced audio quality.
A re-encoding to -0 often solve these issues.
Can you look at a way to store parameters used for encoding in an archive so we
can check it later?
Best regards
Olav Sunde
Olav Sunde wrote:
very good to see
part of the command line
description so users would know how to do it.
Best regards
Olav Sunde
Brian Willoughby
Sound Consulting
On Feb 6, 2012, at 03:16, Olav Sunde wrote:
This next is a feature request: Today it is not possible to know the encoding
of a flac archive. Many new devices support
binaries available for download. Most
links under download still point to 1.2.1 at Sourceforge.
Best regards
Olav Sunde
At 09:56 10.06.2013, you wrote:
Dear Free Audio Tool Lovers,
I am very pleased to announce the first official release of FLAC, the Free
Lossless Audio Codec, in over 6 years
In the changelog I see up to 192 kHz ReplayGain support mentioned for
flac.exe, but not for metaflac. Was it changed in one and not the other??
I really do not know. The discussion on metaflac and support for replay gain
for higher sample rates was back in February/March 2012
At 09:06 26.06.2013, you wrote:
Olav Sunde wrote:
I just followed the redirect Ralph Giles posted about above. That works
as expected, but on https://xiph.org/flac/download.html the Windows
link point to this page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/flac-win/
with only old compiles
Hi
has anyone looked at adding R128gain code to metaflac so we can select to use
this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain?
Best regards
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
to use
this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain?
If this message turns up twice I apologize. I may have used the wrong subject
tag
Regards
Olav Sunde
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
be a bit early to update this in the FLAC
source.
op 16-06-14 10:15, Olav Sunde schreef:
I mention metaflac because there are a few shell scripts that use it to write
RG tags in a flac music library on Linux. With support for Ebu R128 gain in
metaflac (the calculation according to specification
I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne
Hyvärinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I
can not find binaries at the official site.
Olav Sunde
At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyvärinen wrote:
On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik de Castro
ssary is a discussion that should not take place here IMHO.
Best regards
Olav Sunde
>Best regards
>Riggs
>___
>flac-dev mailing list
>flac-dev@xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
