Re: [Flac-dev] Re: multiple core support

2007-09-10 Thread rappard
[snipped] euh :) Just make a flag or something in the api that enables the code for low cpu power devices and/or streaming and disable this when encoding on fast pc (so no streaming)? So it uses file based code then for encoding of files on pc's with multiple cpu's and stream based code for all o

Re: [Flac-dev] wav to flac corruption

2008-02-07 Thread rappard
Erik wrote: The problem you are having is not with flac. Your problem is with your player. If you want to try another player, try sndfile-play from libsndfile which compiles and works on Linux, win32 and Mac OSX. Seconded. Winamp and foobar2000 (both latest versions) are good choices for th

Re: [Flac-dev] wav to flac corruption

2008-02-08 Thread rappard
Unfortunately it seems that the majority of flac players cannot play 24bit files - winamp, windows media player (with flac plugin), vlc, amarok, kaffeine and a few others ALL failed to play the file. I would The latest version of Winamp works fine for me, at least with 24/48 - haven't tried 24/9

Re: [Flac-dev] are 588 sample frames subset or nonsubset?

2008-05-20 Thread rappard
> I am thinking of ripping albums to a single flac file with embedded > cuesheet. As track and index points have to be on a 588 sample boundary due > to the CD TOC standard working in 588 sample frames, I thought it may be > beneficial to rip CDs with a blocksize of 588 samples. [snipped rest] Per

[Flac-dev] FLAC download "for sale"

2008-07-15 Thread rappard
Apologies for the cross-post - kind of scummy: http://flac.en.softonic.com/download http://flac.en.softonic.com/secure-download (See also http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?biz.5.645744.4 and http://www.otakusoftware.com/blog/2008/06/24/beware-softonic-download-scam/) Cheers, Mar

Re: [Flac-dev] download location

2010-05-06 Thread rappard
> I'm sorry if this isn't the place to ask this question, but I was unable to > find any other form of contact on the FLAC website. I'm trying to rip two > CDs to FLAC, and want to use EAC, but the link to download the official FLAC > tools is dead. Therefore, I'm unsure of what to download. Any he

Re: [Flac-dev] Flac-dev Digest, Vol 70, Issue 5

2010-07-29 Thread rappard
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Neil Wilkes > wrote: > > That isgood newsthen - I like to be wrong in these cases!! > The obvious question is coming though... > How in the Blazes do I create this "custom generated CUE sheet" then, > please? > All I have is a 24/48 stereo stream on HDD and th

Re: [Flac-dev] Cue sheets/Tagging question

2010-11-11 Thread rappard
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:14, Neil Wilkes > wrote: > > Is it possible to place track markers that will be reflected in a cue > sheet within a long FLAC file? > I have a label who want to offer FLAC downloads of complete albums - but > there have to be track points designated within the FLAC fil

Re: [flac-dev] Meet the new maintainer

2012-02-01 Thread rappard
[some snips] > tweaked and applied. The main problem is that the FLAC test suite > takes 30 minutes to run on a 2.8 GHz Core II Duo. > > I encourage the keen to do a daily checkout and build. I will be > building it on x86 and amd64 Linux every day and running the full > test suite. Looking for so

Re: [flac-dev] Meet the new maintainer

2012-02-01 Thread rappard
>> > tweaked and applied. The main problem is that the FLAC test suite >> > takes 30 minutes to run on a 2.8 GHz Core II Duo. >> > >> > I encourage the keen to do a daily checkout and build. I will be >> > building it on x86 and amd64 Linux every day and running the full >> > test suite. Looking fo

Re: [flac-dev] Meet the new maintainer

2012-02-01 Thread rappard
>> > I'm particularly interested in seeing the results of compiling >> > FLAC under MSVC and would love to see good quality patches. >> >> It's been a while since I've worked with Visual Studio, so some dumb >> questions ahead. To start: should I use >> http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/p

Re: [flac-dev] Meet the new maintainer

2012-02-01 Thread rappard
>> It's been a while since I've worked with Visual Studio, so some dumb >> questions ahead. To start: should I use >> http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2010-editions/visual-cpp-express, >> or something else? > > That's a fine place to start if you have windows but don't already >

Re: [flac-dev] uncompressed FLAC

2012-03-09 Thread rappard
>> i have seen that the dbPowerAmp ripping and encoding software supports a >> new so-called "FLAC uncompressed" format, e.g. >> >> http://www.audiostream.com/content/dbpoweramps-flac-lossless-uncompressed-wish-come-true > > Wow, check this comment: > >     > http://www.audiostream.com/content/dbpo

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC build for Visual Studio 2010?

2012-03-12 Thread rappard
I'd be happy to test this provided there's an evaluation version of VS2010 available somewhere - is there? On 12 March 2012 17:38, Michael Scherotter wrote: > Has anyone been able to build the FLAC libraries on Windows using Visual > Studio 2010? > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > > Michael S. Scherot

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC build for Visual Studio 2010?

2012-03-13 Thread rappard
Thanks, will try to get to it this week. On 12 March 2012 17:48, Michael Scherotter wrote: > Download the Visual Studio Ultimate Trial here: > http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/try > Thanks, > Michael > > -Original Message- > From: rapp...@gmail.com [mailto:rapp...@gmail.com] On

[flac-dev] FLAC.js

2012-10-28 Thread rappard
http://labs.official.fm/articles/2012/06/15/flac-and-aurora/ ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] Higher compression modes from Flake

2013-03-18 Thread rappard
On 16 March 2013 09:25, Brian Willoughby wrote: > > On Mar 14, 2013, at 13:24, Declan Kelly wrote: >> I want the tightest possible compression, while remaining 100% >> compatible with the subset that all known FLAC decoders can >> successfully >> stream or play now in cars, Hi-Fi units, "MP3 playe

[flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.1b versus 1.3.0: file size differences at level -8 (best)?

2014-09-12 Thread rappard
I thought this had been answered before, but cannot find confirmation: if I recall correctly there's hardly any advantage (if any) to re-encoding from 1.2.1b to 1.3.0 at the highest compression level (8/best), right? --Martin ___ flac-dev mailing list fl

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.1b versus 1.3.0: file size differences at level -8 (best)?

2014-09-12 Thread rappard
Answering my own question: > I thought this had been answered before, but cannot find confirmation: > if I recall correctly there's hardly any advantage (if any) to > re-encoding from 1.2.1b to 1.3.0 at the highest compression level > (8/best), right? > The following post (and subsequent replies,

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

2016-12-22 Thread rappard
> I even had a weird WAV that caused "WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format > type 1 but bits-per-sample=24", but flac dealt with it without problems > and the output file was fine and playable. For what it's worth: this happens to me when I record with my Edirol R-09 in 24-bit mode. I'm guessing s

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

2016-12-22 Thread rappard
> > http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz > > * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs. > > Compiles and runs fine on a MacMini running OpenBSD/current > and on a BeagleBone Black running OpenBSD/current. I can test compilation on a CentOS/VirtualBox virtual machine if there's interest. Drive space is

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

2016-12-22 Thread rappard
> Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have > Windows. Will test on Windows 7, 64-bit (C:\>ver output: version 6.1.7601). Anything I should look at specifically and/or more closely? Is there a (full) test suite I could run? --Martin