Re: [Flac] Standard encoding rates?

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:26:45AM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > AM radio is lower quality (mono) but I don't know > what the digital equivalent would be. Just a minor nit-pick: AM radio can be stereo. However its use is almost nonexistent. See

[Flac] Re: FLAC: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch

On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Harry Sack wrote: But how is it possible then the FLAC encoder allows files which have a bad resulting MD5 to be encoded? Is it because of the bad ram, ... this incorrect MD5 is not detected during encoding? In your original email you mentioned that you had downl

Re: [Flac] FLAC: compression silence frames

On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:50:11PM +0200, Harry Sack wrote: > How does the flac encoder encodes silence frames? See: In particular, the "Constant" model applies. > Is there actually used some space to store these? A tiny bit. > So ba

Re: [Flac] Replay-gain

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:10:51AM -0500, Charles Velasquez wrote: > If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000 > converter dialogue box stating that "applying ReplayGain adjustment > during conversion will irreversibly alter data in encoded file, > unlike ReplayGain scan after e

Re: [Flac] Some queries regarding FLAC

On May 12, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Nawal Kishor Mishra wrote: > > Dear FLAC team, > I have some fundamental doubts regarding FLAC encoder: > > 1) In FLAC encoder there is no option of specifying the bitrate. There is > something called compression-level. I believe that based on the nature of > i