-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Winterhalder
Sent: 21 March 2007 23:41
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Problem extending inherited function
Importance: High
snip big explanation
Mark
Hi, I have a problem extending an inherited function. I put all the
files described here in a zip if you want to test it yourselves:
http://www.webguidepartner.com/~johan/super-problem.zip
I have this mother-class:
class Mother extends MovieClip {
public var txt:TextField;
public
I have some clue that the problem must have something to do with that it
is the text field that triggers the event, and not the movie clip. But
you would expect the super.killingFocus(); to work anyway, regardless of
what calls the function?!
Yes, this is a scope issue -- it tries to call
This is a simple scope issue. The problem is caused exactly by that
what you talked about. When assigning killingFocus to the textfield's
event, use some kind of delegation (e.g. mx.util.Delegate):
txt.onKillFocus = mx.utils.Delegate.create(this, killingFocus);
(off: actually, this is not
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:10 AM
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] Problem extending inherited function
Hi, I have a problem extending an inherited function. I put all the
files described here in a zip if you want to test it yourselves:
http
The way you had your code, the Child class will never receive
the killingFocus call. Add a Delegate within the Mother Class
to put the onKillFocus event into scope with Child...
import mx.utils.Delegate;
class Mother extends MovieClip {
public var txt:TextField;
public
On 3/21/07, Danny Kodicek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm - this seems to go against the stuff we've been talking about recently
(see 'super and this' thread) where people have been saying that inherited
classes are essentially wrapped into one. This is an example where the
ancestor is being
7 matches
Mail list logo
