we've just moved from custom mvc frameworks to pureMVC but if it was left up
to me it would be RobotLegs
a
On 13 September 2010 21:19, Karim Beyrouti wrote:
> Ah - yes, the cool icon must learn robotlegs...
>
> once you know an MVC framework - in theory i guess it more or less applies
> to
I've done my last three projects in robotlegs. All were different sized
projects and I found myself dong no more or less work on any of them. I'd
have to say it's just more nimble than PureMVC. It's easy to grow your app
as scopes tend to creep.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Karim Beyrouti wro
Thanks ! - that helps make the decision.
On 13 Sep 2010, at 21:24, Jesse Warden wrote:
> What Matt Gitchell said.
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Karim Beyrouti wrote:
>
>> Ah - yes, the cool icon must learn robotlegs...
>>
>> once you know an MVC framework - in theory i guess it mo
What Matt Gitchell said.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Karim Beyrouti wrote:
> Ah - yes, the cool icon must learn robotlegs...
>
> once you know an MVC framework - in theory i guess it more or less applies
> to another. Whatever the pros & cons of using a framework for one man
> projects
Thanks for the advise, guess that's a good reason to start with Pure MVC, then
move onto RL. Do you use RL / MVC for all projects, or just in specific
instances ?
Cheers
- karim
On 13 Sep 2010, at 21:14, Matt Gitchell wrote:
> We're using RobotLegs a ton these days, it's fantastic.
> But I'd
Ah - yes, the cool icon must learn robotlegs...
once you know an MVC framework - in theory i guess it more or less applies to
another. Whatever the pros & cons of using a framework for one man projects -
there seems to be some demand for it out there; turned down a job today as i
was not fa
6 matches
Mail list logo
