I think Johns problem can be avoided by just resorting to old school
embedding. I also think it can be avoided by using floating divs instead of
popups, or popups within the player.
I have here version 1.3 of FlashObject, I will talk from this since it's
what I've based my arguments on. I
Sorry John I hadn't read this post, seems like you've got a work around
already and were just trying to gain some insight into the matter.
On 4/17/06, John Grden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sounds like a very rare edge case to me - but first I have to point
out that this isn't an issue with
Hey Geoff, thanks for the response.
I have a question though, and it's not me being a smart-ass or anything
-honestly!
Ok, open IE6, load a flash site with version 6 of the flash player. Open
another instance of IE6, load a different site and do the upgrade to flash 8
(without closing the other
Geoff Stearns wrote:
3) Kevin suggested using his Player.js script - while his other stuff
is really awesome (HistoryKeeper, dang) the Player.js code doesn't
support all the stuff that FlashObject or UFO provide. So really I
think that Kevin should just use FlashObject ;)
I missed the
sounds like a very rare edge case to me - but first I have to point
out that this isn't an issue with FlashObject, it's an issue with the
way ExpressInstall works.
There's just too many variables that have to be in place for this to
actually be an issue.
But there is a way for this to be
sounds like a very rare edge case to me - but first I have to point
out that this isn't an issue with FlashObject, it's an issue with the
way ExpressInstall works.
There's just too many variables that have to be in place for this to
actually be an issue.
Yes and no, but I think we'd just
Hi Geoff,
I'll reply to your comments inline below...
First, I guess I'm not sure why you would need to 'maintain' it. The
script is basically just an API for writing the HTML to embed a swf
file into an html document. This probably won't change significantly
any time soon, so the need to
well that's cool, thanks for the response..
the only thing i'd like to address was this part:
The FlashObject class would just embed swf files. Any additional
concerns
would be seperated from this class, where each class would
interface to
operate with one anotherAs it stands, all of
On Apr 15, 2006, at 3:46 AM, elibol wrote:
I think
you've taken someone elses opinion far too personally, otherwise I
believe
your question would be generally presented rather than personally
scolding
someone.
WTF are you talking about? You obviously don't know me and obviously
Yes you're right Bryan, I didn't consider that you might be someone who
followed him, I didn't know that he was one who people followed. As for
scolding, you were persistently nagging for an explanation. Yes I don't know
you, and you don't know me, so how could you know who I think I am? Why
would
Wow nice move Kevin. How does one implement the Express Installer with your
version?
I don't much like FlashObject and I haven't heard of these other ones, but
after reading about this UFO one, the writer seems to have a very clear
technical understanding on object and language decoupling. He
My detector is just an information repository for the for the user's
installed plash player (if any) at the moment. I haven't gotten around
to researching or implementing an Express Install solution just yet, and
I may not get to it for a long while.
Those other solutions are more robust
On Apr 14, 2006, at 12:44 PM, elibol wrote:
I don't much like FlashObject
What don't you like about it? I have deployed many sites with it
(using express install) and have never had an issue. I quite like
it, (I used to use Colin's Moock FPI), so I am curious as to why you
don't.
Did you ever look at the code?
Jim Kremens
On 4/14/06, bryan.rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 14, 2006, at 12:44 PM, elibol wrote:
I don't much like FlashObject
What don't you like about it? I have deployed many sites with it
(using express install) and have never had an issue. I
On Apr 14, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Jim Kremens wrote:
Did you ever look at the code?
I have taken a look at the javascript and I find it pretty straight
forward (though not commented)...what is that you don't like about
it? Just curious. How would you write it differently?
blue skies,
Hi
Was wondering what everyone is using for flash detection currently.
Is there and consensus as to which is better,
UFO
http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/ufo/
or
Flash Object methods
http://blog.deconcept.com/flashobject/
Thanks in advance!
Jim Bachalo
[e] jbach at bitstream.ca
[c]
My only reservation with FlashObject is that it's written in a style
that makes it pretty un maintainable. Take a look inside
FlashObject.js... should you ever want to change or modify anything in
there, it might get weird...
Jim Kremens
On 4/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo
