Re: [Flashcoders] Re: Active X and Microsoft IE ...

2006-04-19 Thread Bernard Poulin
I am sorry, I didn't try your version explicitely but another "similar" technique. Probably I jumped on conclusions too fast. To be precise, what I found is calling "innerHTML" on an parent object of an tag (on IE) does not renders all the attributes correctly. You could see it by looking at the

[Flashcoders] Re: Active X and Microsoft IE ...

2006-04-18 Thread Geoff Knutzen
I am using flashvars with this technique and am having no troubles at all Is there some circumstance where the flashvars wouldn't work? I don't know what I am missing here. This has worked for me on every test that I have come up with. 2006/04/18, "Bernard Poulin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Just a

Re: [Flashcoders] Re: Active X and Microsoft IE ...

2006-04-18 Thread Bernard Poulin
Just a little note about this technique: It will "void" out the "flashvars" attribute (and potentially other less-frequently used attributes). If you do not use these special attributes, then this technique is perfectly fine. B. 2005/12/22, Geoffrey Knutzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Here is w

[Flashcoders] RE: Active X and Microsoft IE

2006-04-09 Thread Stephen Ford
Thanks to Steven Sacks and Paul BH. After reading your thoughts (about javascript being enabled by default and stats of 3 out of 75000 users have it switched off) I am now going to go forward and use the FlashObject solution from here on in for everything I build. Anyone who thinks I am missin

[Flashcoders] Re: Active X and Microsoft IE ...

2006-04-09 Thread Geoffrey Knutzen
Here is what I am using: classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-44455354" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,0,0"; width="435" height="270" id="flash_home" align="middle"> width="435" height="270" name="flash_home" align="middl