anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
from Metalliq? Just looking for some feedback...performance issues,
comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription
1st,
2005 Version 1.0.124.
HTH,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Rodecker
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:02 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?
anyone out there have any experience
.
HTH,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Rodecker
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:02 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?
anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
I've been disappointed with the MCOM components. Alot of that has to do
with the lack of documentation and support. They match the V2 API's in
many cases, but in the cases where they don't its not always easy to
figure out how to make them work the way you want since the methods and
: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:02 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?
anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
from Metalliq? Just looking for some feedback...performance issues,
comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc
Could someone please email these .mxps to me so I can do a visual inspection?
;-)
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought
Thanks for the info Ryan, that should prove useful in the future.
-Steve
--
*Ryan Matsikas* wrote :
Some people on this list use mCom and a few of the developers (including
myself) are also on the list, if you aren't having luck with
7 matches
Mail list logo
