Re: [Flashcoders] flash and ASP.NET (ryanm)

2005-12-13 Thread ryanm
Interesting approach, Ryan. So, the big advantage here is cost (free!) with the big disadvantage being that we're limited to string data types on the return. Thanks for sharing. The other way is to use the XML object. You can put all of your return data in XML and compress it. XML is extreme

RE: [Flashcoders] flash and ASP.NET (ryanm)

2005-12-13 Thread Kevin Mulvihill
f ryanm > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 6:41 PM > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] flash and ASP.NET (ryanm) > > > Ryan, how would this work? > > > > > // Actionscrip

Re: [Flashcoders] flash and ASP.NET (ryanm)

2005-12-12 Thread ryanm
Ryan, how would this work? // Actionscript var IncomingData:LoadVars = new LoadVars(); IncomingData.onLoad = function(success:Boolean){ if(success){ // Do stuff when data is loaded }else{ trace("Load Failed!");

RE: [Flashcoders] flash and ASP.NET (ryanm)

2005-12-12 Thread Kevin Mulvihill
Ryan, how would this work? > Don't use remoting, just post your data to aspx files and > let them write to the database. > > ryanm ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flas