RE: [Flashcoders] re: self published

2006-05-31 Thread Matthew Simpson
I see. Thanks for the knowledge Thomas. Sounds to me like an XML socket is the way to go. Good Luck! Matthew From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Thomas Marbois Sent: Wed 5/31/2006 1:53 PM To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: [Flashcoders] re: self

Re: [Flashcoders] re: self published

2006-05-31 Thread Mike Britton
Good luck Thomas. From a high-level perspective, your "server flash element" can create a localconnection to receive, and your "client flash element" can do the sending. In the data can be the type of action required, allowing for a switch statement to route it properly, as well as the data itse

[Flashcoders] re: self published

2006-05-31 Thread Thomas Marbois
in reply to: Message: 8 Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:53:56 -0400 From: "Mike Britton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] self published. To: "Flashcoders mailing list" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Someone please cor

[Flashcoders] re: self published

2006-05-31 Thread Thomas Marbois
reply to: Message: 5 Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:01:08 -0400 From: "Matthew Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] self published. To: "Flashcoders mailing list" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I might stand alone on this bu