Re: [Flashcoders] Catalyst

2009-09-30 Thread Joel Stransky
It's definitely not a tool worth integrating into your work flow until at least version 2. For now it might be a nice utility to generate some data that might otherwise be difficult but as far as being able to pass a catalyst file back and forth between artist and developer? No way. On Mon, Sep

Re: [Flashcoders] Catalyst

2009-09-30 Thread Anthony Pace
I hate that it is only mxml. Good to know. Joel Stransky wrote: It's definitely not a tool worth integrating into your work flow until at least version 2. For now it might be a nice utility to generate some data that might otherwise be difficult but as far as being able to pass a catalyst file

Re: [Flashcoders] Catalyst

2009-09-28 Thread allandt bik-elliott
i'm with you on the mxml pushing old ladies into the road tho a On 26 Sep 2009, at 23:29, Anthony Pace wrote: Anyone try catalyst? Does it only output to flex style code that make babies cry, or does it output do pure AS3 too? ___ Flashcoders

RE: [Flashcoders] Catalyst

2009-09-28 Thread Merrill, Jason
Catalyst is still really rough - I wasn't initially impressed with the first public beta at all, but the tool has great potential and I'm hopeful and excited for the release next year. And yes, it's MXML output, not pure AS3. Jason Merrill Bank of America Global Learning Learning

Re: [Flashcoders] Catalyst

2009-09-26 Thread Eric E. Dolecki
It needs layouts and stuff so it's flex with as3 Thanks, Eric On Sep 26, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Anthony Pace anthony.p...@utoronto.ca wrote: Anyone try catalyst? Does it only output to flex style code that make babies cry, or does it output do pure AS3 too?

Re: [Flashcoders] Catalyst

2009-09-26 Thread Latcho
From the video I've seen a while ago; I think you're not far from the tree. Eric E. Dolecki wrote: It needs layouts and stuff so it's flex with as3 Thanks, Eric On Sep 26, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Anthony Pace anthony.p...@utoronto.ca wrote: Anyone try catalyst? Does it only output to flex