The only thing I really like on the surface of this merger is the fact
the Macromedia apps will get tabbed palettes back.
Doesn't Flash 8, Dreamweaver 8, etc. already have that? At least, they
do on my machine. Unless what you mean by a tabbed palette isn't what I
am thinking.
Jason Merrill
The only thing I really like on the surface of this merger is the fact
the Macromedia apps will get tabbed palettes back.
Doesn't Flash 8, Dreamweaver 8, etc. already have that? At least, they
do on my machine. Unless what you mean by a tabbed palette isn't what I
am thinking.
Not really.
, 2005 10:21 AM
Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: [Flashcoders] FAQ Adobe acquisition of Macromedia
Not really. He means Adobe-like paletters that MM was forced to stop using
by a lawsuit from Adobe a couple of years ago (or so the story goes). On
Photoshop, Illustrator and other Adobe tools, you can group panels
Actually you can group panels together in Flash 8, and they'll have tabs.
Click the icon on the right in a tab header and select Group [PanelName]
with. Then choose the panel you want it to be grouped with. Once they
are grouped, they'll each have a tab.
There seems to be a bug: the first
The answer about the Flash Player and Adobe Reader was a little
confusing. We updated the QA to make it more clear. Here's the
updated text:
What are Adobe's plans for Flash Player and Adobe Reader?
Our long-term plan is to develop a universal client by combining PDF,
Flash and HTML in a
Our long-term plan is to develop a universal client by
combining PDF, Flash and HTML in a single, integrated
runtime.
How does this differ from a browser?
M
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Gone are the days of a lightweight flash player.
On Dec 7, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Mike Mountain wrote:
Our long-term plan is to develop a universal client by
combining PDF, Flash and HTML in a single, integrated
runtime.
How does this differ from a browser?
M
I was just about to say it sounds like a browser, but with the ability
to capture apps and content sychronize data, work offline and keep
applets automatically up to date.
I think its basically central, but in a UI that looks more like a browser.
Regards
Hank
On 12/7/05, Mike Mountain [EMAIL
This new client is not in place of the current lightweight player. It
is a separate thing, like central. So there will always be separate
browser plugins for pdf and swf.
Regards
Hank
On 12/7/05, Chad Mefferd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gone are the days of a lightweight flash player.
On Dec 7,
On 12/7/05, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This new client is not in place of the current lightweight player. It
is a separate thing, like central. So there will always be separate
browser plugins for pdf and swf.
it might be apollo, of which i know almost nothing about, but which
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] FAQ Adobe acquisition of Macromedia
Gone are the days of a lightweight flash player.
On Dec 7, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Mike Mountain wrote:
Our long-term plan is to develop a universal client by
combining PDF, Flash and HTML in a single, integrated
Yex, it is apollo. I just didnt use the code word. But that is what I
am referring to.
Regards
Hank
On 12/7/05, Mark Winterhalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/05, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This new client is not in place of the current lightweight player. It
is a separate
such problems - wouldn't a top down
solution be easier - ie. Modify mozilla?
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of hank williams
Sent: 07 December 2005 16:29
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] FAQ Adobe acquisition
It sounds like they will have for download Flash Player 8 and Adobe
Reader for download for a while and eventually create a Flash Player X.
Flash Player X = Flash Player 8 + Adobe Reader
I wouldn't call it a central tho. Hopefully the file size will remain
small or only marginally increase.
I wouldn't call it a central tho. Hopefully the file size will remain
small or only marginally increase.
The new client is called apollo. As far as I know it *is* the new
unified client that they are talking about that does flash + html +
pdf.
Apollo *is*, among other things, the follow on to
Good. Wasn't it being referred to as Apollo or something like that?
On Dec 7, 2005, at 10:15 AM, hank williams wrote:
This new client is not in place of the current lightweight player. It
is a separate thing, like central. So there will always be separate
browser plugins for pdf and swf.
Nevermind. I'm slow.
On Dec 7, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Chad Mefferd wrote:
Good. Wasn't it being referred to as Apollo or something like that?
On Dec 7, 2005, at 10:15 AM, hank williams wrote:
This new client is not in place of the current lightweight player. It
is a separate thing, like
Flash Player X = Flash Player 8 + Adobe Reader
I think Flash player 8.5 will be out before PDF is integrated in the
player though. At least, that's the way it appears to be as things are
right now. I would say it would be more like Flash Player 9 or 10 +
Adobe Reader
Jason Merrill |
Yes. That is correct. It is referring to Apollo, and not the web based
plugins.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hank williams wrote:
Yex, it is apollo. I just didnt use the code word. But that is what I
am referring to.
Regards
Hank
On 12/7/05, Mark Winterhalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, the FAQ items refers to Apollo, and not the web based plugins /
players.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merrill, Jason wrote:
Flash Player X = Flash Player 8 + Adobe Reader
I think Flash player 8.5 will be out before PDF is integrated in the
player though. At least, that's the
Thanks for the straight dope on the topic Mike.
Chad Mefferd
On Dec 7, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Again, the FAQ items refers to Apollo, and not the web based plugins /
players.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merrill, Jason wrote:
Flash Player X = Flash Player 8 + Adobe
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Chambers
Sent: 07 December 2005 19:41
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] FAQ Adobe acquisition of Macromedia
Again, the FAQ items refers to Apollo, and not the web based plugins /
players.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Again, the FAQ items refers to Apollo, and not the web based plugins /
players.
So Apollo will be a sort of web browser that has a flash and PDF
renderer built in? I mean, I know Adobe won't likely market it as a
browser, but that sounds basically like what it will be. What about our
clients who
Apollo Recipe
Embed Mozilla with native optimized Flash and PDF support.
Add shell skinning
Add one click local app installation via XML
Add rich fileIO
Add hardware acceleration via OpenGL
Add ass kicking speed for Flash, 200fps or bust
Add offline
Based on the workflows shown by Kevin Lynch at the Spark Europe
conference, I would think about it more as an app runtime than a browser.
mike chambers
Merrill, Jason wrote:
So Apollo will be a sort of web browser that has a flash and PDF
renderer built in?
Macromedia was a little more straight-up with their downloads though.
The only thing I really like on the surface of this merger is the fact
the Macromedia apps will get tabbed palettes back.
Anyhow, as an example. I had a client over and he needed to open a
PDF. I had a newly formatted laptop
26 matches
Mail list logo
