right, andreas.
eugen
Am 05.03.2006 um 23:03 schrieb Andreas Rønning:
Glad you had a ball, but until Adobe stops ass-raping the FlashCom
community with bizarre licensing practises and the inability to
make statements with a straight face, i don't see how this merger
is positive at
: [Flashcoders] FF Seattle Report
right, andreas.
eugen
Am 05.03.2006 um 23:03 schrieb Andreas Rønning:
Glad you had a ball, but until Adobe stops ass-raping the FlashCom
community with bizarre licensing practises and the
inability to make
statements with a straight face, i
Haha is that positive or negative? :)
Sorry for the OT outburst everyone. It's been brewing for a while.
- A
eugen pflüger wrote:
right, andreas.
eugen
Am 05.03.2006 um 23:03 schrieb Andreas Rønning:
Glad you had a ball, but until Adobe stops ass-raping the FlashCom
community with
, but it is
*not* required.
-David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of eugen pflüger
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 6:50 AM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] FF Seattle Report
right, andreas.
eugen
Am 05.03.2006 um 23:03
dollars is a lot less than $15000 per cpu, as per flex 1.5.
thats why its classed as 'cheap'.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas
Rønning
Sent: 06 March 2006 13:24
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] FF Seattle Report
On 6 Mar 2006, at 13:33, Nick Weekes wrote:
The point is Flex is a completely separate technology Adobe are
actively
pushing forward, and they're trying to get me in on it by teasing
me with a
preview of AS3 ;P Conspiracy! Aiee!! But seriously. It smacks of a
form of
early brand
Glad you had a ball, but until Adobe stops ass-raping the FlashCom
community with bizarre licensing practises and the inability to make
statements with a straight face, i don't see how this merger is positive
at all.
All i see is further separation of the individual solutions Adobe got a
hold
7 matches
Mail list logo
